» Articles » PMID: 31874832

Endoscopic Tympanoplasty with Inlay Cartilage Graft in an University Hospital

Overview
Date 2019 Dec 26
PMID 31874832
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Tympanoplasty is the surgical procedure aimed at the reconstruction of the tympanic membrane and restoration of the sound conducting mechanism. It can be performed with several types of access and grafts and is considered successful when it achieves complete closure of the tympanic perforation and sound conduction improvement.

Objective: To describe the prevalence of successful closure of tympanic perforations and auditory results of endoscopic tympanoplasty with an inlay tragus cartilage graft.

Methods: Retrospective study developed at a tertiary referral hospital. Patients with central tympanic perforations and intact ossicular chains operated with endoscopic tympanoplasty with inlay tragus cartilage graft were included. The neo-tympanum integrity index was evaluated, and the preoperative and postoperative auditory parameters were compared using the paired Student's t-test.

Results: We identified 83 endoscopic tympanoplasties with inlay cartilage, of which 63 (76 %) had an intact neo-tympanum and 20 (24 %) had residual perforations. The preoperative air-bone gap was, on average, 18 ± 8.9 dBHL, and the postoperative 11 ± 10 dBHL (p = 0.0005), showing reduction in 71 % and complete recovery in 27 %. The mean preoperative speech recognition threshold was 35 ± 13.5 and the postoperative SRT was 27 ± 14.4 (p = 0.0002). The preoperative tritonal mean was 34 ± 14.3 and the postoperative was 24 ± 15 (p = 0.0002).

Conclusion: In this series, endoscopic tympanoplasties with inlay tragus cartilage graft showed a 76 % prevalence of complete closure of the tympanic perforation, with significant improvement in the auditory parameters.

Citing Articles

Disparities in access to ear and hearing care in Cambodia: a mixed methods study on patient experiences.

Waterworth C, Watters C, Sokdavy T, Annear P, Dowell R, Grimes C J Laryngol Otol. 2022; 137(4):373-389.

PMID: 35698817 PMC: 10040287. DOI: 10.1017/S0022215122001396.

References
1.
Iacovou E, Vlastarakos P, Papacharalampous G, Kyrodimos E, Nikolopoulos T . Is cartilage better than temporalis muscle fascia in type I tympanoplasty? Implications for current surgical practice. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013; 270(11):2803-13. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2329-4. View

2.
Furukawa T, Watanabe T, Ito T, Kubota T, Kakehata S . Feasibility and advantages of transcanal endoscopic myringoplasty. Otol Neurotol. 2014; 35(4):e140-5. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000298. View

3.
de Freitas M, Oliveira T . The role of different types of grafts in tympanoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 80(4):275-6. PMC: 9444664. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.05.018. View

4.
Carr S, Strachan D, Raine C . Factors affecting myringoplasty success. J Laryngol Otol. 2015; 129(1):23-6. DOI: 10.1017/S0022215114003156. View

5.
Anzola J, Nogueira J . Endoscopic Techniques in Tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2016; 49(5):1253-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2016.05.016. View