» Articles » PMID: 31872249

Safety and Outcome of Very High-power Short-duration Ablation Using 70 W for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract

Aims: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is effective but hampered by pulmonary vein reconnection due to insufficient ablation lesions. High-power delivery over a short period of time (HPSD) in RFA is stated to create more efficient lesions. The aim of this study was to compare intraprocedural safety and outcome of HPSD ablation to conventional power settings in patients undergoing PVI for PAF.

Methods And Results: We included 197 patients with PAF that were scheduled for PVI. An ablation protocol with 70 W and a duration cut-off of 7 s at the anterior left atrium (LA) and 5 s at the posterior LA (HPSD group; n = 97) was compared to a conventional power protocol with 30-40 W for 20-40 s (standard group; n = 100) in terms of periprocedural complications and a 1-year outcome. The HPSD group showed significantly less arrhythmia recurrence during 1-year follow-up with 83.1% of patients free from atrial fibrillation compared to 65.1% in the standard group (P < 0.013). No pericardial tamponade, periprocedural thromboembolic complications, or atrio-oesophageal fistula occurred in either group. Mean radiofrequency time (12.4 ± 3.4 min vs. 35.6 ± 12.1 min) and procedural time (89.5 ± 23.9 min vs. 111.15 ± 27.9 min) were significantly shorter in the HPSD group compared to the standard group (both P < 0.001).

Conclusion: High-power short-duration ablation demonstrated a comparable safety profile to conventional ablation. High-power short-duration ablation using 70 W for 5-7 s leads to significantly less arrhythmia recurrences after 1 year. Radiofrequency and procedural time were significantly shortened.

Citing Articles

Impact of the dispersive patch placement on dissipated power in radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation via a virtual patient study.

Anees M, Moreno Weidmann Z, Vilades Medel D, Guerra J, Gerardo-Giorda L, Petras A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):6986.

PMID: 40011542 PMC: 11865282. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90158-1.


Very High-Power Short-Duration Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease.

Lengauer S, Erhard N, Popa M, Telishevska M, Krafft H, Bahlke F J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025; 36(3):625-631.

PMID: 39853802 PMC: 11903373. DOI: 10.1111/jce.16567.


Optimized workflow with hybrid (very) high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation renders point-by-point pulmonary vein isolation as fast and effective as cryoballoon ablation.

Fusaroli M, Hoogendijk M, Bhagwandien R, Wijchers S, van Boven N, Mahmoodi B J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39797967 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-025-01982-4.


Pulsed Field Ablation Using Focal Contact Force-Sensing Catheters for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Outcomes of the ECLIPSE AF Study.

Anic A, Phlips T, Breskovic T, Mediratta V, Girouard S, Jurisic Z Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024; 18(1):e012794.

PMID: 39698744 PMC: 11753462. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012794.


2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld E, Kalman J, Saad E, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade J J Arrhythm. 2024; 40(6):1217-1354.

PMID: 39669937 PMC: 11632303. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13082.