» Articles » PMID: 31872212

Role of Blue and Red Light in Stomatal Dynamic Behaviour

Overview
Journal J Exp Bot
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Dec 25
PMID 31872212
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plants experience changes in light intensity and quality due to variations in solar angle and shading from clouds and overlapping leaves. Stomatal opening to increasing irradiance is often an order of magnitude slower than photosynthetic responses, which can result in CO2 diffusional limitations on leaf photosynthesis, as well as unnecessary water loss when stomata continue to open after photosynthesis has reached saturation. Stomatal opening to light is driven by two distinct pathways; the 'red' or photosynthetic response that occurs at high fluence rates and saturates with photosynthesis, and is thought to be the main mechanism that coordinates stomatal behaviour with photosynthesis; and the guard cell-specific 'blue' light response that saturates at low fluence rates, and is often considered independent of photosynthesis, and important for early morning stomatal opening. Here we review the literature on these complicated signal transduction pathways and osmoregulatory processes in guard cells that are influenced by the light environment. We discuss the possibility of tuning the sensitivity and magnitude of stomatal response to blue light which potentially represents a novel target to develop ideotypes with the 'ideal' balance between carbon gain, evaporative cooling, and maintenance of hydraulic status that is crucial for maximizing crop performance and productivity.

Citing Articles

How to utilize far-red photons effectively: substitution or supplementation with photosynthetically active radiation? A case study of greenhouse lettuce.

Yan Z, Li X, Li Z, Song J, Dou H, Yang Y BMC Plant Biol. 2025; 25(1):228.

PMID: 39972440 PMC: 11837345. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-025-06205-6.


Environmental selection underlies distinct distribution patterns of closely related European evening primroses.

Wozniak-Chodacka M, Kocurek M, Pilarska M, Niewiadomska E Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4436.

PMID: 39910164 PMC: 11799430. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88888-3.


Light quality regulates growth and flavonoid content in a widespread forest understorey medicinal species Georgi.

Ma J, Zhang J, Xie L, Ye J, Zhou L, Yu D Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1488649.

PMID: 39737373 PMC: 11683125. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1488649.


The role of photosynthetic activity in the regulation of flg22-induced local and systemic defence reaction in tomato.

Czekus Z, Koprivanacz P, Kukri A, Iqbal N, Ordog A, POoR P Photosynthetica. 2024; 60(2):259-270.

PMID: 39650767 PMC: 11558501. DOI: 10.32615/ps.2022.015.


Speed of light-induced stomatal movement is not correlated to initial or final stomatal conductance in rice.

Xiong Z, Luo Q, Xiong D, Cui K, Peng S, Huang J Photosynthetica. 2024; 60(3):350-359.

PMID: 39650102 PMC: 11558595. DOI: 10.32615/ps.2022.013.


References
1.
McAusland L, Davey P, Kanwal N, Baker N, Lawson T . A novel system for spatial and temporal imaging of intrinsic plant water use efficiency. J Exp Bot. 2013; 64(16):4993-5007. PMC: 3830482. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ert288. View

2.
De Angeli A, Zhang J, Meyer S, Martinoia E . AtALMT9 is a malate-activated vacuolar chloride channel required for stomatal opening in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun. 2013; 4:1804. PMC: 3644109. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2815. View

3.
Andres Z, Perez-Hormaeche J, Leidi E, Schlucking K, Steinhorst L, McLachlan D . Control of vacuolar dynamics and regulation of stomatal aperture by tonoplast potassium uptake. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(17):E1806-14. PMC: 4035970. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1320421111. View

4.
Kaiser H, Kappen L . In situ observation of stomatal movements and gas exchange of Aegopodium podagraria L. in the understorey. J Exp Bot. 2000; 51(351):1741-9. DOI: 10.1093/jexbot/51.351.1741. View

5.
Gautier H, Vavasseur A, Gans P, Lasceve G . Relationship between Respiration and Photosynthesis in Guard Cell and Mesophyll Cell Protoplasts of Commelina communis L. Plant Physiol. 1991; 95(2):636-41. PMC: 1077579. DOI: 10.1104/pp.95.2.636. View