» Articles » PMID: 31864562

Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Ligament Complex Using Dermal Allograft: A Biomechanical Analysis

Overview
Journal Arthroscopy
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Dec 23
PMID 31864562
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the posterior translational and rotational stability of the acromioclavicular (AC) joint following reconstruction of the superior acromioclavicular ligament complex (ACLC) using dermal allograft.

Methods: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used (mean age of 65.3 ± 6.9 years). The resistance force against posterior translation (10 mm) and torque against posterior rotation (20°) was measured. Specimens were first tested with both the intact ACLC and coracoclavicular ligaments. The ACLC and coracoclavicular ligaments were then transected so simulate a Type III/V AC joint dislocation. Each specimen then underwent 3 testing conditions, performed in the following order: (1) ACLC patch reconstruction alone, (2) ACLC patch with an anatomic coracoclavicular reconstruction (ACCR) using semitendinosus allograft, and (3) the transected ACLC with an ACCR only. Differences in posterior translational and rotational torque across testing conditions were analyzed with a one-way repeated analysis of variance analysis.

Results: Mean resistance against posterior translation in the intact condition was 65.76 ± 23.8 N. No significant difference found between the intact condition compared with specimens with the ACLC-patch only (44.2 ± 11.3 N, P = .06). The ACCR technique, when tested alone, had significantly less posterior translational resistance compared with the intact condition (38.5 ± 8.94 N, P = .008). ACLC patch in combination with an ACCR was closest in restoring native posterior translation (57.1 ± 19.2 N, P = .75). For rotational resistance, only the addition of the ACLC patch with an ACCR (0.51 ± 0.07 N-m) demonstrated similar torque compared with the intact joint (0.89 ± 0.5 N-m, P = .06).

Conclusions: The ACLC-patch plus ACCR technique was able to closest restore the percent of normal posterior translational and rotational stability.

Clinical Relevance: Recurrent posterior instability of the AC joint is a potential complication after coracoclavicular reconstruction surgery. In the in vitro setting, this study demonstrated increased AC joint stability with the addition of an ACLC reconstruction using dermal allograft.

Citing Articles

Is there a role for acromioclavicular (AC) joint capsular repair and reconstruction in high-grade AC separations? A systematic review.

Khoriati A, Antonios T, Fozo Z, Choudhury A, Arnander M, Pearse E EFORT Open Rev. 2025; 10(2):115-124.

PMID: 40071970 PMC: 11825160. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-2023-0121.


Surgical Advances in the Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Injury: A Comprehensive Review.

Ma Y, Ma Z, Guo J, Ma X, Lv S, Cheng S Med Sci Monit. 2024; 30:e942969.

PMID: 39548667 PMC: 11577671. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.942969.


Arthroscopically Assisted Tensionable Cerclage Reconstruction of an Acromioclavicular Separation With Combined Fixation of the Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligaments.

Ardebol J, Hwang S, Horinek J, Parsons B, Denard P Arthrosc Tech. 2023; 12(3):e321-e327.

PMID: 37013023 PMC: 10066044. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.11.010.


Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Joint Using a Double Augmentation With Hamstrings Tendon and Dermal Graft.

Perez Rodriguez M, Paniagua Gonzalez A, Gonzalez Gomez I, Aguado Fernandez J, Minuesa Asensio A Arthrosc Tech. 2023; 12(3):e433-e440.

PMID: 37013021 PMC: 10066045. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.08.049.


Evaluation of the coracoid bone tunnel placement on Dog Bone™ button fixation for acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a cadaver study combined with finite element analysis.

Gao R, Zhang W, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Hu Y, Wu H BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):18.

PMID: 36624428 PMC: 9827623. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06119-6.