» Articles » PMID: 31861490

Dynamics of Sows' Activity Housed in Farrowing Pens with Possibility of Temporary Crating Might Indicate the Time when Sows Should Be Confined in A Crate Before the Onset of Farrowing

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2019 Dec 22
PMID 31861490
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One way to reduce the negative impact of farrowing crates on sow welfare is to limit confinement of sows from the onset of farrowing until the end of the critical period of piglets' life a few days after farrowing. In order to provide an indication of the time when sows should be confined in crates, ear tag-based acceleration data was modeled to provide the following two types of alarms: A "first-stage" alarm that indicates the beginning of nest-building behaviour, and a "second-stage" alarm that indicates the ending of the nest-building behaviour. In total, 53 sows were included in the experiment. Each sow had an ear tag with an accelerometer sensor mounted on the ear. Acceleration data were modeled with the Kalman filtering and fixed interval smoothing (KALMSMO) algorithm. It was possible to predict farrowing on the basis of increased activity in the validation dataset with a median of 8 h 51 min before the onset of farrowing. Alarms that indicated the need for confinement of the sow in a crate were generated with a median of 2 h 3 min before the onset of farrowing. These results suggest that the developed model should be sufficient to provide early warning of approaching farrowing and secondary alarm indicating the need to confine a sow in a crate.

Citing Articles

A Review of the Monitoring Techniques Used to Detect Oestrus in Sows.

Glencorse D, Grupen C, Bathgate R Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39943101 PMC: 11816321. DOI: 10.3390/ani15030331.


Sow serenity: automatic long-term measurement of lying behavior in crates and free-farrowing pens using 3D accelerometers.

Knoll M, Gygax L, Hillmann E J Anim Sci. 2024; 102.

PMID: 38581277 PMC: 11044708. DOI: 10.1093/jas/skae101.


Using Sound Location to Monitor Farrowing in Sows.

van Erp-van der Kooij E, de Graaf L, de Kruijff D, Pellegrom D, de Rooij R, Welters N Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(22).

PMID: 38003155 PMC: 10668711. DOI: 10.3390/ani13223538.


Farmers' Perspectives of the Benefits and Risks in Precision Livestock Farming in the EU Pig and Poultry Sectors.

Kopler I, Marchaim U, Tikasz I, Opalinski S, Kokin E, Mallinger K Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(18).

PMID: 37760267 PMC: 10525424. DOI: 10.3390/ani13182868.


Implementation of Computer-Vision-Based Farrowing Prediction in Pens with Temporary Sow Confinement.

Oczak M, Maschat K, Baumgartner J Vet Sci. 2023; 10(2).

PMID: 36851413 PMC: 9966211. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci10020109.


References
1.
King R, Baxter E, Matheson S, Edwards S . Temporary crate opening procedure affects immediate post-opening piglet mortality and sow behaviour. Animal. 2018; 13(1):189-197. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731118000915. View

2.
Lee J, Jin L, Park D, Chung Y . Automatic Recognition of Aggressive Behavior in Pigs Using a Kinect Depth Sensor. Sensors (Basel). 2016; 16(5). PMC: 4883322. DOI: 10.3390/s16050631. View

3.
Marchant J, Rudd A, Mendl M, Broom D, Meredith M, Corning S . Timing and causes of piglet mortality in alternative and conventional farrowing systems. Vet Rec. 2000; 147(8):209-14. DOI: 10.1136/vr.147.8.209. View

4.
Singh C, Verdon M, Cronin G, Hemsworth P . The behaviour and welfare of sows and piglets in farrowing crates or lactation pens. Animal. 2016; 11(7):1210-1221. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731116002573. View

5.
Lambertz C, Petig M, Elkmann A, Gauly M . Confinement of sows for different periods during lactation: effects on behaviour and lesions of sows and performance of piglets. Animal. 2015; 9(8):1373-8. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731115000889. View