» Articles » PMID: 31861205

How Can Systematic Reviews Teach Us More About the Implementation of the 3Rs and Animal Welfare?

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2019 Dec 22
PMID 31861205
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper describes the introduction of the systematic review methodology in animal-based research and the added value of this methodology in relation to the 3Rs and beyond. The 3Rs refer to Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement of animal studies. A systematic review (SR) is defined as a literature review focused on a single question that tries to identify, appraise, select, and synthesise all high-quality research evidence relevant to that question. Examples are given on how SRs lead to the implementation of the 3Rs and better science. Additionally, a broader context is given regarding societal, political, and scientific developments. Various examples of systematic reviews are given to illustrate the current situation regarding reporting, quality, and translatability of animal-based research. Furthermore, initiatives that have emerged to move further towards more responsible and sustainable research is of benefit for both animals and humans.

Citing Articles

STEED: A data mining tool for automated extraction of experimental parameters and risk of bias items from in vivo publications.

Zurrer W, Cannon A, Ewing E, Bruschweiler D, Bugajska J, Hild B PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0311358.

PMID: 39591436 PMC: 11594395. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311358.


Effectiveness of gold nanoparticles in prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in animal models: a systematic review.

Choudhury M, Brunton P, Schwass D, Pletzer D, Ratnayake J, Dias G Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):39.

PMID: 38273391 PMC: 10809540. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02425-9.


Neuroimaging findings in preclinical amyotrophic lateral sclerosis models-How well do they mimic the clinical phenotype? A systematic review.

Cannon A, Zurrer W, Zejlon C, Kulcsar Z, Lewandowski S, Piehl F Front Vet Sci. 2023; 10:1135282.

PMID: 37205225 PMC: 10185801. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1135282.


Osteochondral regenerative engineering: challenges, state-of-the-art and translational perspectives.

Barui S, Ghosh D, Laurencin C Regen Biomater. 2023; 10:rbac109.

PMID: 36683736 PMC: 9845524. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbac109.


A Novel Improved Thromboembolism-Based Rat Stroke Model That Meets the Latest Standards in Preclinical Studies.

Pawletko K, Jedrzejowska-Szypulka H, Bogus K, Pascale A, Fahmideh F, Marchesi N Brain Sci. 2022; 12(12).

PMID: 36552131 PMC: 9776070. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12121671.


References
1.
Yauw S, Wever K, Hoesseini A, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, van Goor H . Systematic review of experimental studies on intestinal anastomosis. Br J Surg. 2015; 102(7):726-34. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9776. View

2.
De Vries R, Oerlemans A, Trommelmans L, Dierickx K, Gordijn B . Ethical aspects of tissue engineering: a review. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2008; 14(4):367-75. DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2008.0199. View

3.
Zeeff S, Kunne C, Bouma G, de Vries R, Te Velde A . Actual Usage and Quality of Experimental Colitis Models in Preclinical Efficacy Testing: A Scoping Review. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016; 22(6):1296-305. DOI: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000758. View

4.
Wieschowski S, Chin W, Federico C, Sievers S, Kimmelman J, Strech D . Preclinical efficacy studies in investigator brochures: Do they enable risk-benefit assessment?. PLoS Biol. 2018; 16(4):e2004879. PMC: 5886385. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004879. View

5.
Hooijmans C, Tillema A, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M . Enhancing search efficiency by means of a search filter for finding all studies on animal experimentation in PubMed. Lab Anim. 2010; 44(3):170-5. PMC: 3104815. DOI: 10.1258/la.2010.009117. View