» Articles » PMID: 31857919

Impact of Ilizarov Fixation Technique on the Limb Functionality and Self-esteem of Patients with Unilateral Tibial Fractures

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2019 Dec 21
PMID 31857919
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction Tibial fractures with nonunion are frequently managed with Ilizarov external fixation. Living with an external frame has some psychological impact which is readily neglected from the literature. We conducted a study to evaluate the status of limb functionality in patients managed with the Ilizarov external ring fixator technique and assess their self-esteem while living with the frame. Materials and methods This is a prospective observational study conducted in the Orthopedic Department of Dr. Ruth KM Phau Civil Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, from June 2018 to June 2019. A total of 26 patients consecutively managed with Ilizarov external fixation for infected nonunion, with unilateral tibial fractures, were included. To assess the postoperative functionality status, lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) was used. To assess and evaluate the impact of the external frame application on the self-esteem of these patients, Rosenberg's self-esteem (RSE) scale was used. For each patient, LEFS and RSE scales were administered at the time of hospital discharge, after six months of frame application, and at the time of removal of the frame. Results The mean duration of hospital stay was 4.11 ± 1.23 weeks. The mean LEFS scores increased by 47% from hospital discharge until the time of frame removal. The differences were highly significant ( < 0.001). There was a 12% decline in the mean score of self-esteem from the time of discharge till the time of removal of the Ilizarov frame and these differences were highly significant ( < 0.001). Conclusion Ilizarov technique improves the limb functionality status significantly in participants with a unilateral tibial fracture. However, it also reduces their self-esteem during the period of frame application. Psychological support is recommended for participants living with an external fixation frame to protect their self-esteem.

Citing Articles

Vancomycin-encapsulated hydrogel loaded microarc-oxidized 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V implant for infected bone defects: Reconstruction, anti-infection, and osseointegration.

Zhang T, Zhou W, Yang W, Bi J, Li H, Gao X Bioact Mater. 2024; 42:18-31.

PMID: 39262845 PMC: 11388676. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.07.035.


Is fracture management merely a physical process? Exploring the psychological effects of internal and external fixation.

Jia Q, Peng Z, Huang A, Jiang S, Zhao W, Xie Z J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):231.

PMID: 38589910 PMC: 11000308. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04655-6.

References
1.
Shore B, DiMauro J, Spence D, Miller P, Glotzbecker M, Spencer S . Uniplanar Versus Taylor Spatial Frame External Fixation For Pediatric Diaphyseal Tibia Fractures: A Comparison of Cost and Complications. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015; 36(8):821-828. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000561. View

2.
Khan M, Rashid H, Umer M, Qadir I, Hafeez K, Iqbal A . Salvage of infected non-union of the tibia with an Ilizarov ring fixator. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2015; 23(1):52-5. DOI: 10.1177/230949901502300112. View

3.
Lavini F, DallOca C, Bartolozzi P . Bone transport and compression-distraction in the treatment of bone loss of the lower limbs. Injury. 2010; 41(11):1191-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.09.030. View

4.
Gustilo R, Anderson J . Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976; 58(4):453-8. View

5.
Schep N, Van Lieshout E, Patka P, Vogels L . Long-term functional and quality of live assessment following post-traumatic distraction osteogenesis of the lower limb. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2009; 4(3):107-12. PMC: 2787204. DOI: 10.1007/s11751-009-0070-3. View