» Articles » PMID: 31857629

Anthropogenic Substrate-borne Vibrations Impact Anuran Calling

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Dec 21
PMID 31857629
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anthropogenic disturbance is a major cause of the biodiversity crisis. Nevertheless, the role of anthropogenic substrate vibrations in disrupting animal behavior is poorly understood. Amphibians comprise the terrestrial vertebrates most sensitive to vibrations, and since communication is crucial to their survival and reproduction, they are a suitable model for investigating this timely subject. Playback tests were used to assess the effects of substrate vibrations produced by two sources of anthropogenic activity- road traffic and wind turbines- on the calling activity of a naïve population of terrestrial toads. In their natural habitat, a buried tactile sound transducer was used to emit simulated traffic and wind turbine vibrations, and changes in the toads' acoustic responses were analyzed by measuring parameters important for reproductive success: call rate, call duration and dominant frequency. Our results showed a significant call rate reduction by males of Alytes obstetricans in response to both seismic sources, whereas other parameters remained stable. Since females of several species prefer males with higher call rates, our results suggest that anthropogenically derived substrate-borne vibrations could reduce individual reproductive success. Our study demonstrates a clear negative effect of anthropogenic vibrations on anuran communication, and the urgent need for further investigation in this area.

Citing Articles

Influence of conspecifics and road noise on the properties of the advertisement call of (Anura, Hylidae).

Marques de Abreu L, Guerra V, Sole M Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(8):e11261.

PMID: 39114176 PMC: 11303979. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11261.


Potential effects of traffic noise on anuran call characteristics in Louisiana, USA during winter.

Kunberger J, Price T, Crawford C, Vestal-Laborde A, Long A Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(7):e11679.

PMID: 38952649 PMC: 11214969. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11679.


Convergent Anuran Middle Ear Loss Lacks a Universal, Adaptive Explanation.

Womack M, Hoke K Brain Behav Evol. 2023; 98(6):290-301.

PMID: 37913755 PMC: 10885836. DOI: 10.1159/000534936.


Effect of natural abiotic soil vibrations, rainfall and wind on anuran calling behavior: a test with captive-bred midwife toads (Alytes obstetricans).

De Luca J, Zaffaroni-Caorsi V, Bosch J, Llusia D, Beltran J, Marquez R J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2022; 209(1):105-113.

PMID: 36508004 PMC: 9742647. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-022-01596-5.


Noise matters: elephants show risk-avoidance behaviour in response to human-generated seismic cues.

Mortimer B, Walker J, Lolchuragi D, Reinwald M, Daballen D Proc Biol Sci. 2021; 288(1953):20210774.

PMID: 34187196 PMC: 8242925. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0774.

References
1.
Tuttle M, Ryan M . Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the neotropics. Science. 1981; 214(4521):677-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.214.4521.677. View

2.
Lengagne T, Slater P . The effects of rain on acoustic communication: tawny owls have good reason for calling less in wet weather. Proc Biol Sci. 2002; 269(1505):2121-5. PMC: 1691141. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2115. View

3.
Caorsi V, Both C, Cechin S, Antunes R, Borges-Martins M . Effects of traffic noise on the calling behavior of two Neotropical hylid frogs. PLoS One. 2017; 12(8):e0183342. PMC: 5576727. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183342. View

4.
Hetherington T . Role of the opercularis muscle in seismic sensitivity in the bullfrog Rana catesbeiana. J Exp Zool. 1985; 235(1):27-34. DOI: 10.1002/jez.1402350105. View

5.
Barr D, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily H . Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J Mem Lang. 2014; 68(3). PMC: 3881361. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001. View