» Articles » PMID: 31853975

Multimodality Image Registration in the Head-and-neck Using a Deep Learning-derived Synthetic CT As a Bridge

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2019 Dec 20
PMID 31853975
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To develop and demonstrate the efficacy of a novel head-and-neck multimodality image registration technique using deep-learning-based cross-modality synthesis.

Methods And Materials: Twenty-five head-and-neck patients received magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) (CT ) scans on the same day with the same immobilization. Fivefold cross validation was used with all of the MR-CT pairs to train a neural network to generate synthetic CTs from MR images. Twenty-four of 25 patients also had a separate CT without immobilization (CT ) and were used for testing. CT 's were deformed to the synthetic CT, and compared to CT registered to MR. The same registrations were performed from MR to CT and from synthetic CT to CT . All registrations used B-splines for modeling the deformation, and mutual information for the objective. Results were evaluated using the 95% Hausdorff distance among spinal cord contours, landmark error, inverse consistency, and Jacobian determinant of the estimated deformation fields.

Results: When large initial rigid misalignment is present, registering CT to MRI-derived synthetic CT aligns the cord better than a direct registration. The average landmark error decreased from 9.8 ± 3.1 mm in MR→CT to 6.0 ± 2.1 mm in CT →CT deformable registrations. In the CT to MR direction, the landmark error decreased from 10.0 ± 4.3 mm in CT →MR deformable registrations to 6.6 ± 2.0 mm in CT →CT deformable registrations. The Jacobian determinant had an average value of 0.98. The proposed method also demonstrated improved inverse consistency over the direct method.

Conclusions: We showed that using a deep learning-derived synthetic CT in lieu of an MR for MR→CT and CT→MR deformable registration offers superior results to direct multimodal registration.

Citing Articles

Deformable registration for nasopharyngeal carcinoma using adaptive mask and weight allocation strategy based CycleFCNs model.

Guo Y, Chen J, Lu L, Qiu L, Lan L, Guo F Radiat Oncol. 2025; 20(1):26.

PMID: 40001040 PMC: 11863897. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02603-0.


MUsculo-Skeleton-Aware (MUSA) deep learning for anatomically guided head-and-neck CT deformable registration.

Liu H, McKenzie E, Xu D, Xu Q, Chin R, Ruan D Med Image Anal. 2024; 99:103351.

PMID: 39388843 PMC: 11817760. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2024.103351.


A systematic literature review: deep learning techniques for synthetic medical image generation and their applications in radiotherapy.

Sherwani M, Gopalakrishnan S Front Radiol. 2024; 4:1385742.

PMID: 38601888 PMC: 11004271. DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2024.1385742.


Towards full-stack deep learning-empowered data processing pipeline for synchrotron tomography experiments.

Zhang Z, Li C, Wang W, Dong Z, Liu G, Dong Y Innovation (Camb). 2023; 5(1):100539.

PMID: 38089566 PMC: 10711238. DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100539.


Review and recommendations on deformable image registration uncertainties for radiotherapy applications.

Nenoff L, Amstutz F, Murr M, Archibald-Heeren B, Fusella M, Hussein M Phys Med Biol. 2023; 68(24).

PMID: 37972540 PMC: 10725576. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0d8a.


References
1.
Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever M, Pluim J . elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009; 29(1):196-205. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2009.2035616. View

2.
Roberson P, McLaughlin P, Narayana V, Troyer S, Hixson G, Kessler M . Use and uncertainties of mutual information for computed tomography/ magnetic resonance (CT/MR) registration post permanent implant of the prostate. Med Phys. 2005; 32(2):473-82. DOI: 10.1118/1.1851920. View

3.
Ulin K, Urie M, Cherlow J . Results of a multi-institutional benchmark test for cranial CT/MR image registration. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 77(5):1584-9. PMC: 2906611. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.017. View

4.
Brock K, Mutic S, McNutt T, Li H, Kessler M . Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 132. Med Phys. 2017; 44(7):e43-e76. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12256. View

5.
Dalca A, Balakrishnan G, Guttag J, Sabuncu M . Unsupervised learning of probabilistic diffeomorphic registration for images and surfaces. Med Image Anal. 2019; 57:226-236. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.07.006. View