» Articles » PMID: 31847909

Getting More Than "claps": Incentive Preferences of Voluntary Community-based Mobilizers in Tanzania

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2019 Dec 19
PMID 31847909
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Marie Stopes Tanzania works with a voluntary cadre of 66 community-based mobilizers (CBMs), who are tasked with raising awareness, generating demand and providing referral to potential clients for family planning, comprehensive post-abortion care and cervical cancer screening. CBMs extend the reach of urban clinics to peri-urban communities, enhancing access to sexual and reproductive health services. In an effort to optimize performance of CBMs, a study was conducted to explore the drivers of CBM motivation and inform the design of an incentive scheme.

Methods: Three focus group discussions with 17 CBMs and 11 interviews with CBM supervisors and managers were conducted in three clinics and the head office. After thematic analysis of transcripts, findings on motivational factors were discussed in a reflection workshop and informed the development of a discrete choice experiment (DCE) involving 61 CBMs as respondents. The DCE included eight choice questions on two incentive schemes, each consisting of five attributes related to remuneration, training, supervision, benefits and identification. For each attribute, different incentive options were presented, based on the outcomes of the qualitative assessment. The DCE results were analysed using conditional logistic regression.

Results: A variety of factors motivated CBMs. Most CBMs were motivated to conduct their work because of an intrinsic desire to serve their community. The most mentioned extrinsic motivational factors were recognition from the community and supervisors, monthly allowance, availability of supporting materials and identification, trainings, supervision and feedback on performance. Recommendations for improvement were translated into the DCE. Incentive attributes that were found to be significant in DCE analysis (p < 0.05), in preference order, were carrying an ID card, bi-monthly training, supervision conducted via both monthly meetings at clinics and visits from the head office, and a monthly flat rate remuneration (over pay for performance).

Conclusion: Despite the recognition that being a CBM is voluntary, incentives, especially those of non-financial nature, are important motivators. Incentive schemes should include basic compensation with a mix of other incentives to facilitate CBMs' work and enhance their motivation. Programme designs need to take into account the voices of community-based workers, to optimize their performance and service delivery to communities they serve.

Citing Articles

A systematic review of the types, workload, and supervision mechanism of community health workers: lessons learned for Indonesia.

Nida S, Tyas A, Putri N, Larasanti A, Widoyopi A, Sumayyah R BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):82.

PMID: 38468218 PMC: 10926673. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02319-2.


Multisectoral, Combination HIV Prevention for Adolescent Girls and Young Women: A Qualitative Study of the DREAMS Implementation Trajectory in Zambia.

Rosen J, Musheke M, Mulenga D, Namukonda E, Jani N, Mbizvo M Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022; 10(5).

PMID: 36316147 PMC: 9622277. DOI: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00089.


The experiences and challenges of community health volunteers as agents for behaviour change programming in Africa: a scoping review.

Ndu M, Andoniou E, McNally S, Olea Popelka F, Tippett M, Nouvet E Glob Health Action. 2022; 15(1):2138117.

PMID: 36314363 PMC: 9629118. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2138117.


Understanding community health worker employment preferences in Malang district, Indonesia, using a discrete choice experiment.

Gadsden T, Sujarwoto S, Purwaningtyas N, Maharani A, Tampubolon G, Oceandy D BMJ Glob Health. 2022; 7(8).

PMID: 35953209 PMC: 9379506. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008936.


The influence of incentives on community health worker motivation in the provision of family planning. A case of Msalala and Shinyanga Districts, Tanzania.

Kok M, Lucas S, Otege J, Mkwazu Z, Zuleta I, Smet E J Public Health Afr. 2022; 12(2):1319.

PMID: 35126887 PMC: 8791022. DOI: 10.4081/jphia.2021.1319.


References
1.
Mangham L, Hanson K, McPake B . How to do (or not to do) ... Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy Plan. 2008; 24(2):151-8. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czn047. View

2.
Akintola O . Perceptions of rewards among volunteer caregivers of people living with AIDS working in faith-based organizations in South Africa: a qualitative study. J Int AIDS Soc. 2010; 13:22. PMC: 2901349. DOI: 10.1186/1758-2652-13-22. View

3.
Bhatia K . Community health worker programs in India: a rights-based review. Perspect Public Health. 2014; 134(5):276-82. DOI: 10.1177/1757913914543446. View

4.
Chikaphupha K, Kok M, Nyirenda L, Namakhoma I, Theobald S . Motivation of health surveillance assistants in Malawi: A qualitative study. Malawi Med J. 2016; 28(2):37-42. PMC: 5117097. DOI: 10.4314/mmj.v28i2.2. View

5.
Scott K, Beckham S, Gross M, Pariyo G, Rao K, Cometto G . What do we know about community-based health worker programs? A systematic review of existing reviews on community health workers. Hum Resour Health. 2018; 16(1):39. PMC: 6097220. DOI: 10.1186/s12960-018-0304-x. View