» Articles » PMID: 31834472

Adherence to the EAU Guideline Recommendations for Systemic Chemotherapy in Penile Cancer: Results of the E-PROPS Study Group Survey

Overview
Journal World J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2019 Dec 14
PMID 31834472
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To validate the adherence of urologists to chemotherapy recommendations given in the EAU guidelines on PeCa. The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on penile cancer (PeCa) are predominantly based on retrospective studies with low level of evidence.

Materials And Methods: A 14-item-survey addressing general issues of PeCa treatment was developed and sent to 45 European hospitals. 557 urologists participated in the survey of which 43.5%, 19.3%, and 37.2% were in-training, certified, and in leading positions, respectively. Median response rate among participating departments was 85.7% (IQR 75-94%). Three of 14 questions addressed clinical decisions on neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative chemotherapy. Survey results were analyzed by bootstrap-adjusted multivariate logistic-regression-analysis to identify predictors for chemotherapy recommendations consistent with the guidelines.

Results: Neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative chemotherapy was recommended according to EAU guidelines in 21%, 26%, and 48%, respectively. For neoadjuvant chemotherapy, urologists holding leading positions or performing chemotherapy were more likely to recommend guideline-consistent treatment (OR 1.85 and 1.92 with p = 0.007 and 0.003, respectively). Supporting resources (i.e., guidelines, textbooks) were used by 23% of survey participants and significantly improved consistency between treatment recommendations and Guideline recommendations in all chemotherapy settings (p = 0.010-0.001). Department size and university center status were no significant predictors for all three endpoints.

Conclusions: In this study, we found a very low rate of adherence to the EAU guidelines on systemic treatment for PeCa. Further investigations are needed to clarify whether this missing adherence is a consequence of limited individual knowledge level or of the low grade of guideline recommendations.

Citing Articles

The landscape of penile cancer research in Germany and Austria: a survey among professors in academic centers holding chair positions and results of a literature search.

Sarcan S, Wolff I, Lusuardi L, Kravchuk A, Wiegland J, Yakac A World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):12.

PMID: 38189947 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04719-y.


Immune-based therapies in penile cancer.

Joshi V, Spiess P, Necchi A, Pettaway C, Chahoud J Nat Rev Urol. 2022; 19(8):457-474.

PMID: 35851333 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00617-x.


Does the Identification of a Minimum Number of Cases Correlate With Better Adherence to International Guidelines Regarding the Treatment of Penile Cancer? Survey Results of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study (E-PROPS).

Lebentrau S, Wakileh G, Schostak M, Schmid H, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Merseburger A Front Oncol. 2021; 11:759362.

PMID: 34912711 PMC: 8667688. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.759362.


Systemic treatment of penile squamous cell carcinoma-hurdles and hopes of preclinical models and clinical regimens: a narrative review.

Thomas A, do Canto Alvim L, Rainho C, Juengel E, Blaheta R, Spiess P Transl Androl Urol. 2021; 10(10):4085-4098.

PMID: 34804850 PMC: 8575571. DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-945.


[Quality of care criteria in the treatment of penile cancer].

Thomas A, Kolling F, Haferkamp A, Tsaur I Urologe A. 2021; 60(2):186-192.

PMID: 33452551 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01429-w.


References
1.
Christodoulidou M, Sahdev V, Houssein S, Muneer A . Epidemiology of penile cancer. Curr Probl Cancer. 2015; 39(3):126-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2015.03.010. View

2.
Bada M, Berardinelli F, Nyirady P, Varga J, Ditonno P, Battaglia M . Adherence to the EAU guidelines on Penile Cancer Treatment: European, multicentre, retrospective study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019; 145(4):921-926. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-02864-9. View

3.
Cindolo L, Spiess P, Bada M, Chipollini J, Nyirady P, Chiodini P . Adherence to EAU guidelines on penile cancer translates into better outcomes: a multicenter international study. World J Urol. 2018; 37(8):1649-1657. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2549-3. View

4.
Thuret R, Sun M, Lughezzani G, Budaus L, Liberman D, Abdollah F . A contemporary population-based assessment of the rate of lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 18(2):439-46. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1315-6. View

5.
Dickstein R, Munsell M, Pagliaro L, Pettaway C . Prognostic factors influencing survival from regionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the penis after preoperative chemotherapy. BJU Int. 2014; 117(1):118-25. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12946. View