» Articles » PMID: 31832887

Digital Medicine and Evolution of Remote Patient Monitoring in Cardiac Electrophysiology: A State-of-the-Art Perspective

Overview
Date 2019 Dec 14
PMID 31832887
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: With the evolution in digital medicine to identify and monitor cardiac electrophysiological (EP) conditions, increased access to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), and reimbursements for non-face-to-face care, remote patient monitoring (RPM) is becoming a key part of the EP service line. RPM of cardiac electrophysiological conditions including the use of CIEDs has improved the quality of care and high patient satisfaction and proved to be cost-effective. The focus of this review is literature on RPM in EP, evidence from randomized trials, and observational studies including those of Apple Watch and future of CIEDs.

Recent Findings: RPM has progressed to use implantable devices and wearable technologies like sensors embedded in smartphones and apps. American College of Cardiology recently launched a digital transformation network to support digital navigation and RPM across different cardiovascular diseases. The information presented here can inform healthcare providers of the most widely implemented and effective forms of RPM for patients with chronic EP conditions.

Citing Articles

Digital Health Technologies in Pediatric Infectious Disease and the Perspective of Patients and Healthcare Professionals: A Review.

Saji A, Komel A, Khan M, Niraula S, Naeem B, Ahsan A Health Sci Rep. 2025; 8(3):e70514.

PMID: 40041773 PMC: 11872690. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70514.


Biosymbiotic platform for chronic long-range monitoring of biosignals in limited resource settings.

Stuart T, Farley M, Amato J, Thien R, Hanna J, Bhatia A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(50):e2307952120.

PMID: 38048458 PMC: 10723125. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2307952120.


Digital Phenotyping: Data-Driven Psychiatry to Redefine Mental Health.

Oudin A, Maatoug R, Bourla A, Ferreri F, Bonnot O, Millet B J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e44502.

PMID: 37792430 PMC: 10585447. DOI: 10.2196/44502.


Development of an Evidence-Based Conceptual Model of the Health Care Sector Under Digital Transformation: Integrative Review.

Konopik J, Blunck D J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e41512.

PMID: 37289482 PMC: 10288351. DOI: 10.2196/41512.


Real-world Characterization and Use of Insertable Cardiac Monitor Remote Programming.

Mahajan D, Frost K, Herrmann K, McGee-Taylor R J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2022; 13(11):5230-5235.

PMID: 36570481 PMC: 9721296. DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2022.13112.


References
1.
Cantillon D, Loy M, Burkle A, Pengel S, Brosovich D, Hamilton A . Association Between Off-site Central Monitoring Using Standardized Cardiac Telemetry and Clinical Outcomes Among Non-Critically Ill Patients. JAMA. 2016; 316(5):519-24. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.10258. View

2.
Zeitler E, Piccini J . Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2016; 26(6):568-77. PMC: 4958580. DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2016.03.012. View

3.
Quinn C, Shardell M, Terrin M, Barr E, Ballew S, Gruber-Baldini A . Cluster-randomized trial of a mobile phone personalized behavioral intervention for blood glucose control. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34(9):1934-42. PMC: 3161305. DOI: 10.2337/dc11-0366. View

4.
Ganeshan R, Enriquez A, Freeman J . Remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices: current state and future directions. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017; 33(1):20-30. DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000471. View

5.
Elenko E, Underwood L, Zohar D . Defining digital medicine. Nat Biotechnol. 2015; 33(5):456-61. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3222. View