» Articles » PMID: 31832390

Trends in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis in Patients with Distal Radius Fractures Based on a National Claims Database

Overview
Journal J Bone Metab
Date 2019 Dec 14
PMID 31832390
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A history of osteoporotic fractures is strongly associated with the subsequent osteoporotic fractures. To prevent subsequent fractures, the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis following osteoporotic fractures are very important. A distal radius fracture (DRF) is the second most common type of osteoporotic fracture in South Korea. We analyzed the rate of osteoporosis diagnosis within 6 months post-DRF.

Methods: We used data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service nationwide claims database from 2010 to 2016. International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision codes and procedures codes were used to identify patients aged over 50 years with newly diagnosed DRFs; the osteoporosis assessments of these patients were then analyzed. We used Cochran-Armitage trend test to examine trends in osteoporosis diagnosis.

Results: A search of database identified 77,209 DRFs in patient aged above 50 years of age from 2011 to 2016. Among these patients, only 19,305 (25.0%) underwent diagnostic examination for osteoporosis. The number of osteoporosis examinations increased slightly, but not significantly, every year (=0.061).

Conclusions: Clinicians who treat DRFs shoulder also evaluated patients for osteoporosis after DRFs.

Citing Articles

Impact of an Outpatient Fracture Liaison Service on Osteoporosis Evaluation Among Patients With Upper Extremity Fragility Fracture.

Seyok T, Collins J, Erikson S, Charles J, Earp B Hand (N Y). 2022; 19(2):256-262.

PMID: 36113071 PMC: 10953516. DOI: 10.1177/15589447221120851.


Quality improvement initiatives in the care and prevention of fragility fractures in the Asia Pacific region.

Mitchell P, Ang S, Mercado-Asis L, Rey-Matias R, Chen W, Flicker L Arch Osteoporos. 2022; 17(1):115.

PMID: 35987919 PMC: 9392505. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-022-01153-2.


Osteoporosis management and secondary fragility fracture rates in patients with multiple sclerosis: a matched cohort study.

Ross B, Ross A, Lee O, Waters T, Familia M, Sherman W Osteoporos Int. 2022; 33(9):1999-2010.

PMID: 35670832 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06451-6.


Future Fracture Risk in Upper Extremity Fracture and Non-Fracture Patients.

Seyok T, Collins J, Erikson S, Charles J, Earp B Hand (N Y). 2022; 18(7):1095-1101.

PMID: 35220774 PMC: 10798202. DOI: 10.1177/15589447211049521.


Population-based Analysis for Risk of Suicide Death in Elderly Patients after Osteoporotic Fracture: a Nested Case-Control Study.

Jang S, Cha Y, Lee J, Kim H, Kim K, Choy W J Korean Med Sci. 2021; 36(36):e225.

PMID: 34519185 PMC: 8438184. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e225.


References
1.
Kim S, Ha Y, Park Y, Lee S, Koo K . Orthopedic surgeon's awareness can improve osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture: a prospective cohort study. J Korean Med Sci. 2011; 26(11):1501-7. PMC: 3207055. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.11.1501. View

2.
Cosman F, de Beur S, LeBoff M, Lewiecki E, Tanner B, Randall S . Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014; 25(10):2359-81. PMC: 4176573. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2. View

3.
Kim H, Ha Y, Kim T, Cho H, Lee Y, Baek J . Healthcare Costs of Osteoporotic Fracture in Korea: Information from the National Health Insurance Claims Database, 2008-2011. J Bone Metab. 2017; 24(2):125-133. PMC: 5472799. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2017.24.2.125. View

4.
Park C, Lee Y, Ha Y . Change of Bone Mineral Density Measurement among Patients with Osteoporotic Fractures in Korean Population Using National Claim Database. J Bone Metab. 2017; 24(3):183-186. PMC: 5613023. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2017.24.3.183. View

5.
Mao S, Li D, Luo Y, Syed Y, Budoff M . Application of quantitative computed tomography for assessment of trabecular bone mineral density, microarchitecture and mechanical property. Clin Imaging. 2015; 40(2):330-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.09.016. View