» Articles » PMID: 31822140

T2 Mapping As a Predictor of Nonperfused Volume in MRgFUS Treatment of Desmoid Tumors

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialties Oncology
Pharmacology
Date 2019 Dec 12
PMID 31822140
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop an alternative method of non-contrast monitoring of tissue ablation during focused ultrasound treatment. Desmoid tumors are benign but locally aggressive soft tissue tumors that arise from fibroblast cells. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) has emerged as an alternative to conventional therapies, showing promising results in reduction of tumor volume without significant side effects. The gold-standard assessment of the reduction of viable tumor volume post-treatment is non-perfused volume (NPV) and evaluation of NPV is typically performed with post-treatment gadolinium enhanced MR imaging. However, as gadolinium cannot be repeatedly administered during treatments, there is a need for alternative non-contrast monitoring of the tissue to prevent over and under treatment. Double-echo and multi-echo images were acquired before, during and after the MRgFUS treatment. T2 maps were generated with an exponential fit and T2 maps were compared to post-treatment post-contrast images. In all five MRgFUS treatment sessions, T2 mapping showed excellent qualitative agreement with the post-contrast NPV. T2 mapping may be used to visualize the extent of ablation with focused ultrasound and can be used as a predictor of NPV prior to the administration of contrast during the post-treatment assessment.

Citing Articles

Diffusion-weighted imaging as a non-gadolinium alternative for immediate assessing nonperfused area of adenomyosis after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) ablation: a potential technique but with slightly overestimate.

Huang Y, Zhou S, Su Y, Cai S Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(12):9522-9532.

PMID: 39698591 PMC: 11651985. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-453.


Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations: 2024 Update.

Bader K, Padilla F, Haworth K, Ellens N, Dalecki D, Miller D J Ultrasound Med. 2024; 44(3):381-433.

PMID: 39526313 PMC: 11796337. DOI: 10.1002/jum.16611.


MRI T2 mapping assessment of T2 relaxation time in desmoid tumors as a quantitative imaging biomarker of tumor response: preliminary results.

Souza F, DAmato G, Jonczak E, Costa P, Trent J, Rosenberg A Front Oncol. 2024; 13:1286807.

PMID: 38188297 PMC: 10766853. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1286807.


A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation.

Fite B, Wang J, Ghanouni P, Ferrara K BME Front. 2022; 2022.

PMID: 35957844 PMC: 9364780. DOI: 10.34133/2022/9758652.

References
1.
Dinger S, Fridjhon P, Rubin D . Thermal Excitation of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents Using Spin Resonance. PLoS One. 2016; 11(6):e0158194. PMC: 4920350. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158194. View

2.
Ghanouni P, Dobrotwir A, Bazzocchi A, Bucknor M, Bitton R, Rosenberg J . Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound treatment of extra-abdominal desmoid tumors: a retrospective multicenter study. Eur Radiol. 2016; 27(2):732-740. PMC: 5097700. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4376-5. View

3.
Wijlemans J, Deckers R, van den Bosch M, Seinstra B, van Stralen M, van Diest P . Evolution of the ablation region after magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation in a Vx2 tumor model. Invest Radiol. 2013; 48(6):381-6. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182820257. View

4.
Peng P, Hyder O, Mavros M, Turley R, Groeschl R, Firoozmand A . Management and recurrence patterns of desmoids tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of 211 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19(13):4036-42. PMC: 3568525. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2634-6. View

5.
Baron P, Ries M, Deckers R, de Greef M, Tanttu J, Kohler M . In vivo T2 -based MR thermometry in adipose tissue layers for high-intensity focused ultrasound near-field monitoring. Magn Reson Med. 2013; 72(4):1057-64. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25025. View