Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Disk Disease in Three Scandinavian Countries: An International Register Study Based on Three Merged National Spine Registers

Overview

Journal Global Spine J

Publisher Sage Publications

Date 2019 Dec 11

PMID 31819851

Citations 5

Authors

Mikkel Osterheden Andersen

Peter Fritzell

Soren Peter Eiskjaer

Tobias Lagerback

Olle Hagg

Dennis Nordvall

Greger Lonne

Tore Solberg

Wilco Jacobs

Miranda Van Hooff

Paul Gerdhem

Martin Gehrchen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Study Design: Observational study of prospectively collected data.

Objectives: Patients with chronic low back pain resistant to nonoperative treatment often face a poor prognosis for recovery. The aim of the current study was to compare the variation and outcome of surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease in the Scandinavian countries based on The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement core spine data sets.

Methods: Anonymized individual level data from 3 national registers were pooled into 1 database. At the time of surgery, the patient reports data on demographics, lifestyle topics, comorbidity, and data on health-related quality of life such as Oswestry Disability Index, Euro-Qol-5D, and back and leg pain scores. The surgeon records diagnosis, type of surgery performed, and complications. One-year follow-ups are obtained with questionnaires. Baseline and 1-year follow-up data were analyzed to expose any differences between the countries.

Results: A total of 1893 patients were included. At 1-year follow-up, 1315 (72%) patients responded. There were statistically significant baseline differences in age, smoking, comorbidity, frequency of previous surgery and intensity of back and leg pain. Isolated fusion was the primary procedure in all the countries ranging from 84% in Denmark to 76% in Sweden. There was clinically relevant improvement in all outcome measures except leg pain.

Conclusions: In homogenous populations with similar health care systems the treatment traditions can vary considerably. Despite variations in preoperative variables, patient reported outcomes improve significantly and clinically relevant with surgical treatment.

Citing Articles

Lumbar intervertebral disc replacement in Australia: An epidemiological study.

Dragan Z, George A, Campbell R, Gray R, Sivakumar B, Symes M J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024; 15(3):338-342.

PMID: 39483838 PMC: 11524562. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_119_24.

The Norwegian registry for spine surgery (NORspine): cohort profile.

Mikkelsen E, Ingebrigtsen T, Thyrhaug A, Olsen L, Nygaard O, Austevoll I Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(11):3713-3730.

PMID: 37718341 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07929-5.

Usability and performance expectancy govern spine surgeons' use of a clinical decision support system for shared decision-making on the choice of treatment of common lumbar degenerative disorders.

Eiskjaer S, Pedersen C, Skov S, Andersen M Front Digit Health. 2023; 5:1225540.

PMID: 37654781 PMC: 10465695. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1225540.

Validating the predictive precision of the dialogue support tool on Danish patient cohorts.

Pedersen C, Andersen M, Carreon L, Eiskjaer S N Am Spine Soc J. 2022; 13:100188.

PMID: 36579158 PMC: 9791922. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100188.

Visualising statistical models using dynamic nomograms.

Jalali A, Alvarez-Iglesias A, Roshan D, Newell J PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0225253.

PMID: 31730633 PMC: 6857916. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225253.

References

Fairbank J . Why are there different versions of the Oswestry Disability Index?. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 20(1):83-6. DOI: 10.3171/2013.9.SPINE13344. View

Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A . Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(11):1131-41. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00002. View

Moller H, Hedlund R . Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis--a prospective randomized study: part 1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(13):1711-5. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200007010-00016. View

Clement R, Welander A, Stowell C, Cha T, Chen J, Davies M . A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain. Acta Orthop. 2015; 86(5):523-33. PMC: 4564773. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1036696. View

Turner D, Schunemann H, Griffith L, Beaton D, Griffiths A, Critch J . The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 63(1):28-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.024. View

Fairbank J, Pynsent P . The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017. View

Stromqvist B, Fritzell P, Hagg O, Jonsson B, Sanden B . Swespine: the Swedish spine register : the 2012 report. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22(4):953-74. PMC: 3631024. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2758-9. View

Carreon L, Djurasovic M, Dimar 2nd J, Owens 2nd R, Crawford 3rd C, Puno R . Can the anxiety domain of EQ-5D and mental health items from SF-36 help predict outcomes after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016; 25(3):352-6. DOI: 10.3171/2016.2.SPINE151472. View

Hojmark K, Stottrup C, Carreon L, Andersen M . Patient-reported outcome measures unbiased by loss of follow-up. Single-center study based on DaneSpine, the Danish spine surgery registry. Eur Spine J. 2015; 25(1):282-286. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4127-3. View

10.

Revicki D, Hays R, Cella D, Sloan J . Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61(2):102-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012. View

11.

Hjermstad M, Fayers P, Haugen D, Caraceni A, Hanks G, Loge J . Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011; 41(6):1073-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016. View

12.

Brox J, Sorensen R, Friis A, Nygaard O, Indahl A, Keller A . Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(17):1913-21. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083234.62751.7A. View

13.

Solberg T, Sorlie A, Sjaavik K, Nygaard O, Ingebrigtsen T . Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine?. Acta Orthop. 2010; 82(1):56-63. PMC: 3229998. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2010.548024. View

14.

Ostelo R, Deyo R, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M . Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(1):90-4. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10. View

15.

Parkin D, Devlin N, Feng Y . What Determines the Shape of an EQ-5D Index Distribution?. Med Decis Making. 2016; 36(8):941-51. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X16645581. View

16.

Trotter J . Patient registries: a new gold standard for "real world" research. Ochsner J. 2012; 4(4):211-4. PMC: 3400525. View

17.

Benson K, Hartz A . A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(25):1878-86. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200006223422506. View

18.

Johnsen L, Hellum C, Nygaard O, Storheim K, Brox J, Rossvoll I . Comparison of the SF6D, the EQ5D, and the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013; 14:148. PMC: 3648434. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-148. View

19.

Berg S, Tropp H . Results from a randomized controlled study between total disc replacement and fusion compared with results from a spine register. SAS J. 2015; 4(3):68-74. PMC: 4365640. DOI: 10.1016/j.esas.2010.01.005. View

20.

Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J, Yu L, Barker K, Collins R . Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ. 2005; 330(7502):1233. PMC: 558090. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38441.620417.8F. View