Cost-effectiveness and Safety of Interspinous Process Decompression (Superion)

Overview

Journal Pain Med

Specialties Critical Care
Neurology
Psychiatry

Date 2019 Dec 7

PMID 31808529

Citations 12

Authors

Kevin Cairns

Tim Deer

Dawood Sayed

Kim van Noort

Kevin Liang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: There are several treatment options for patients suffering from lumbar spinal stenosis, including surgical and conservative care. Interspinous spacer decompression using the Superion device offers a less invasive procedure for patients who fail conservative treatment before traditional decompression surgery. This review assesses the current cost-effectiveness, safety, and performance of lumbar spinal stenosis treatment modalities compared with the Superion interspinous spacer procedure.

Methods: EMBASE and PubMed were searched to find studies reporting on the cost-effectiveness, safety, and performance of conservative treatment, including medicinal treatments, epidural injections, physical therapy, and alternative methods, as well as surgical treatment, including laminectomy, laminectomy with fusion, and interspinous spacer decompression. Results were supplemented with manual searches.

Results: Despite substantial costs, persistent conservative treatment (>12 weeks) of lumbar spinal stenosis showed only minimal improvement in pain and functionality. When conservative treatment fails, surgery is more effective than continuing conservative treatment. Lumbar laminectomy with fusion has considerably greater cost than laminectomy alone, as the length of hospital stay increases, the costs for implants are substantial, and complications increase. Although laminectomy and the Superion have comparable outcomes, the Superion implant is positioned percutaneously. This approach may minimize the direct and indirect costs of outpatient rehabilitation and absenteeism, respectively.

Conclusions: Superion interspinous lumbar decompression is a minimally invasive procedure for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who have failed conservative treatment. Compared with extending conservative treatment or traditional spinal surgery, interspinous lumbar decompression reduces the direct and indirect costs associated with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Citing Articles

Web-based machine learning application for interpretable prediction of prolonged length of stay after lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a retrospective cohort study with explainable AI.

Yasheng P, Yusufu A, Yimiti Y, Luan H, Peng C, Song X Front Physiol. 2025; 16:1542240.

PMID: 40046179 PMC: 11880216. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1542240.

Advancing the design of interspinous fixation devices for improved biomechanical performance: dual . single-locking set screw mechanisms and symmetrical . asymmetrical plate designs.

Chin K, Lore V, Spayde E, Costigan W, Irfan Z, Battel O J Spine Surg. 2024; 10(3):386-394.

PMID: 39399071 PMC: 11467278. DOI: 10.21037/jss-24-13.

Impact of Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities on Access to Interspinous Spacer for Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Nationwide Medicare Analysis.

Cho A, Tran O, McGovern A, Chan K, Yong R J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024; .

PMID: 39042335 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-02097-8.

Longitudinal Analysis of the Care Pathway of Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in the US.

Naidu R, Tran O, Schatman M J Pain Res. 2024; 17:1979-1987.

PMID: 38854929 PMC: 11162185. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S454887.

Is the interspinous process device safe and effective in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Han B, Chen Y, Liang W, Yang Y, Ding Z, Yin P Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(3):881-891.

PMID: 38342843 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08119-z.

References

Peters J, Durand W, Monteiro K, Dumenco L, George P . Opioid Overdose Hospitalizations among Medicare-Disability Beneficiaries. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018; 31(6):881-896. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.06.180152. View

Ammendolia C, Stuber K, de Bruin L, Furlan A, Kennedy C, Rampersaud Y . Nonoperative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 37(10):E609-16. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318240d57d. View

Miller L, Block J . Interspinous spacer implant in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Pain Res Treat. 2012; 2012:823509. PMC: 3289933. DOI: 10.1155/2012/823509. View

Adogwa O, Parker S, Shau D, Mendenhall S, Aaronson O, Cheng J . Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of revision neural decompression and instrumented fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the value of surgical intervention. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011; 16(2):135-40. DOI: 10.3171/2011.9.SPINE11308. View

Patel V, Whang P, Haley T, Bradley W, Nunley P, Miller L . Two-year clinical outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing two interspinous spacers for treatment of moderate lumbar spinal stenosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014; 15:221. PMC: 4109165. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-221. View

Cohen S, Bicket M, Jamison D, Wilkinson I, Rathmell J . Epidural steroids: a comprehensive, evidence-based review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013; 38(3):175-200. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31828ea086. View

Vowles K, McEntee M, Julnes P, Frohe T, Ney J, van der Goes D . Rates of opioid misuse, abuse, and addiction in chronic pain: a systematic review and data synthesis. Pain. 2015; 156(4):569-576. DOI: 10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460357.01998.f1. View

Loguidice V, Bini W, Shabat S, Miller L, Block J . Rationale, design and clinical performance of the Superion® Interspinous Spacer: a minimally invasive implant for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2011; 8(4):419-26. DOI: 10.1586/erd.11.24. View

Harrop J, Hilibrand A, Mihalovich K, Dettori J, Chapman J . Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment for degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(22 Suppl 1):S75-85. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000545. View

10.

Lurie J . Interspinous spacers for lumbar spinal stenosis: commentary on van den Akker-van Marle et al. Spine J. 2016; 16(6):711-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.12.084. View

11.

Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Benyamin R, Hirsch J . Cost Utility Analysis of Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural Injections in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation, Central Spinal Stenosis, and Axial or Discogenic Low Back Pain. Pain Physician. 2017; 20(4):219-228. View

12.

Parker S, Godil S, Mendenhall S, Zuckerman S, Shau D, McGirt M . Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014; 21(2):143-9. DOI: 10.3171/2014.3.SPINE1320. View

13.

Lonne G, Johnsen L, Aas E, Lydersen S, Andresen H, Ronning R . Comparing cost-effectiveness of X-Stop with minimally invasive decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(8):514-20. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000798. View

14.

Parker S, Anderson L, Nelson T, Patel V . Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer. Int J Spine Surg. 2015; 9:28. PMC: 4528571. DOI: 10.14444/2028. View

15.

Skidmore G, Ackerman S, Bergin C, Ross D, Butler J, Suthar M . Cost-effectiveness of the X-STOP® interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36(5):E345-56. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f2ed2f. View

16.

Manchikanti L, Kaye A, Manchikanti K, Boswell M, Pampati V, Hirsch J . Efficacy of epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis: a systematic review. Anesth Pain Med. 2015; 5(1):e23139. PMC: 4350165. DOI: 10.5812/aapm.23139. View

17.

de Schepper E, Overdevest G, Suri P, Peul W, Oei E, Koes B . Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: an updated systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(8):E469-81. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828935ac. View

18.

Macedo L, Hum A, Kuleba L, Mo J, Truong L, Yeung M . Physical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2013; 93(12):1646-60. PMC: 3870489. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20120379. View

19.

Adogwa O, Davison M, Vuong V, Khalid S, Lilly D, Desai S . Long-Term Costs of Maximum Nonoperative Treatments in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Stenosis or Spondylolisthesis that Ultimately Required Surgery: A 5-Year Cost Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 44(6):424-430. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002849. View

20.

Andersen T, Bunger C, Sogaard R . Long-term health care utilisation and costs after spinal fusion in elderly patients. Eur Spine J. 2012; 22(5):977-84. PMC: 3657062. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2479-5. View