Comparison of Marginal and Internal Fit Between Stainless Steel Crowns and Esthetic Crowns of Primary Molars Using Different Luting Cements

Overview

Journal Dent Res J (Isfahan)

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2019 Dec 6

PMID 31803381

Citations 8

Authors

Sanaa Najeh Al-Haj Ali

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: This study was to assess and compare the marginal and internal fit of stainless steel crowns (SSCs) with those of preveneered SSCs and zirconia crowns using different luting cements.

Materials And Methods: In this study, 36 primary first molars were divided into three groups ( = 12) each prepared to receive different crowns (SSCs, preveneered SSCs, or zirconia crowns). Each group was further subgrouped ( = 4) according to the luting cement (resin cement, glass ionomer cement [GIC], or resin-modified GIC [RMGIC]). After cementation, the teeth were sectioned in the buccolingual direction to assess the marginal and internal fit. The results were analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni statistical tests. The level of significance was set at < 0.05.

Results: Zirconia crowns, especially those cemented with resin cement, were associated with the lowest marginal and internal gap width. Regardless of the luting cement, no significant difference was observed between all three crowns tested in terms of marginal gap ( > 0.05); however, zirconia crowns cemented with resin cement had significantly lower internal gap than preveneered SSCs and SSCs cemented with resin cement. In addition, those cemented with RMGIC had significantly lower internal gap than preveneered SSCs cemented with that cement ( < 0.05).

Conclusion: Zirconia crowns cemented with resin cement were the most accurately fitted internally, while marginally, they were not significantly different from the rest of crown-luting cement combinations tested.

Citing Articles

The fracture resistance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with zirconia crowns, lithium disilicate or resin based ceramic endocrowns.

Ali A, Abo-Elsoud A, Helmy Y BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):583.

PMID: 38764030 PMC: 11103835. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04332-4.

SEM Evaluation of the Marginal Gap of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Full Crowns and the Effect of Post Crystallization: An In Vitro Study.

Shely A, Lugassy D, Anufriev M, Nissan J, Rauchwerger O, Ben-Izhack G Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38534285 PMC: 10969533. DOI: 10.3390/dj12030061.

A Machine Learning Approach for Modelling Cold-Rolling Curves for Various Stainless Steels.

Contreras-Fortes J, Rodriguez-Garcia M, Sales D, Sanchez-Miranda R, Almagro J, Turias I Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(1).

PMID: 38204001 PMC: 10779456. DOI: 10.3390/ma17010147.

Clinical and radiographic performance of preformed zirconia crowns and stainless-steel crowns in permanent first molars: 18-month results of a prospective, randomized trial.

Geduk N, Ozdemir M, Erbas Unverdi G, Ballikaya E, Cehreli Z BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(1):828.

PMID: 37924021 PMC: 10623757. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03501-1.

Zirconia Crowns for Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Alzanbaqi S, Alogaiel R, Alasmari M, Al Essa A, Khogeer L, Alanazi B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(5).

PMID: 35270531 PMC: 8910015. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19052838.

References

Innes N, Ricketts D, Chong L, J Keightley A, Lamont T, Santamaria R . Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; (12):CD005512. PMC: 7387869. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005512.pub3. View

Yilmaz Y, Gurbuz T, Eyuboglu O, Belduz N . The repair of preveneered posterior stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2008; 30(5):429-35. View

Cunali R, Saab R, Correr G, da Cunha L, Ornaghi B, Ritter A . Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Zirconia Crowns: A Comparative Study of Assessment Methods. Braz Dent J. 2017; 28(4):467-473. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201601531. View

Comlekoglu M, Dundar M, Ozcan M, Gungor M, Gokce B, Artunc C . Influence of cervical finish line type on the marginal adaptation of zirconia ceramic crowns. Oper Dent. 2009; 34(5):586-92. DOI: 10.2341/08-076-L. View

Yuksel E, Zaimoglu A . Influence of marginal fit and cement types on microleakage of all-ceramic crown systems. Braz Oral Res. 2011; 25(3):261-6. DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242011000300012. View

Korkut L, Cotert H, Kurtulmus H . Marginal, internal fit and microleakage of zirconia infrastructures: an in-vitro study. Oper Dent. 2011; 36(1):72-9. DOI: 10.2341/10-107-LR1. View

Mountain G, Wood D, Toumba J . Bite force measurement in children with primary dentition. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2010; 21(2):112-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01098.x. View

Ludwig K, Fontana M, Vinson L, Platt J, Dean J . The success of stainless steel crowns placed with the Hall technique: a retrospective study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014; 145(12):1248-53. DOI: 10.14219/jada.2014.89. View

Shearer B, Gough M, Setchell D . Influence of marginal configuration and porcelain addition on the fit of In-Ceram crowns. Biomaterials. 1996; 17(19):1891-5. DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(95)00302-9. View

10.

Jacobs M, Windeler A . An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 65(3):436-42. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90239-s. View

11.

Habib S, Asiri W, Hefne M . Effect of anatomic, semi-anatomic and non-anatomic occlusal surface tooth preparations on the adaptation of zirconia copings. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015; 6(6):444-50. PMC: 4279041. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.444. View

12.

Braga R, Ferracane J, Condon J . Polymerization contraction stress in dual-cure cements and its effect on interfacial integrity of bonded inlays. J Dent. 2003; 30(7-8):333-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00047-7. View

13.

Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson L, Wozniak W . A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 10(5):478-84. View

14.

Groten M, Girthofer S, Probster L . Marginal fit consistency of copy-milled all-ceramic crowns during fabrication by light and scanning electron microscopic analysis in vitro. J Oral Rehabil. 1998; 24(12):871-81. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00592.x. View

15.

Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G . Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Dent Mater. 2004; 20(5):463-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.004. View

16.

Shiflett K, White S . Microleakage of cements for stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 1997; 19(4):262-6. View

17.

Afshar H, Ghandehari M, Soleimani B . Comparison of Marginal Circumference of Two Different Pre-Crimped Stainless Steel Crowns for Primary Molars After Re-Crimping. J Dent (Tehran). 2016; 12(12):926-31. PMC: 4983309. View

18.

Mulder R, Medhat R, Mohamed N . analysis of the marginal adaptation and discrepancy of stainless steel crowns. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2018; 4(1):20-29. PMC: 5844029. DOI: 10.1080/23337931.2018.1444995. View

19.

Al-Haj Ali S, Farah R . In vitro comparison of microleakge between preformed metal crowns and aesthetic crowns of primary molars using different adhesive luting cements. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018; 19(6):387-392. DOI: 10.1007/s40368-018-0369-1. View

20.

Waggoner W . Restoring primary anterior teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2002; 24(5):511-6. View