» Articles » PMID: 31802997

Re-weighting of Sound Localization Cues by Audiovisual Training

Overview
Journal Front Neurosci
Date 2019 Dec 6
PMID 31802997
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sound localization requires the integration in the brain of auditory spatial cues generated by interactions with the external ears, head and body. Perceptual learning studies have shown that the relative weighting of these cues can change in a context-dependent fashion if their relative reliability is altered. One factor that may influence this process is vision, which tends to dominate localization judgments when both modalities are present and induces a recalibration of auditory space if they become misaligned. It is not known, however, whether vision can alter the weighting of individual auditory localization cues. Using virtual acoustic space stimuli, we measured changes in subjects' sound localization biases and binaural localization cue weights after ∼50 min of training on audiovisual tasks in which visual stimuli were either informative or not about the location of broadband sounds. Four different spatial configurations were used in which we varied the relative reliability of the binaural cues: interaural time differences (ITDs) and frequency-dependent interaural level differences (ILDs). In most subjects and experiments, ILDs were weighted more highly than ITDs before training. When visual cues were spatially uninformative, some subjects showed a reduction in auditory localization bias and the relative weighting of ILDs increased after training with congruent binaural cues. ILDs were also upweighted if they were paired with spatially-congruent visual cues, and the largest group-level improvements in sound localization accuracy occurred when both binaural cues were matched to visual stimuli. These data suggest that binaural cue reweighting reflects baseline differences in the relative weights of ILDs and ITDs, but is also shaped by the availability of congruent visual stimuli. Training subjects with consistently misaligned binaural and visual cues produced the ventriloquism aftereffect, i.e., a corresponding shift in auditory localization bias, without affecting the inter-subject variability in sound localization judgments or their binaural cue weights. Our results show that the relative weighting of different auditory localization cues can be changed by training in ways that depend on their reliability as well as the availability of visual spatial information, with the largest improvements in sound localization likely to result from training with fully congruent audiovisual information.

Citing Articles

Active listening modulates the spatial hearing experience: a multicentric study.

Valzolgher C, Rosi T, Ghiselli S, Cuda D, Gullotta J, Zanetti D Exp Brain Res. 2024; 243(1):15.

PMID: 39636399 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06955-z.


Population coding of auditory space in the dorsal inferior colliculus persists with altered binaural cues.

Rogalla M, Quass G, Yardley H, Martinez-Voigt C, Ford A, Wallace G bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39314270 PMC: 11419156. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.13.612867.


Localizing 3D motion through the fingertips: Following in the footsteps of elephants.

Snir A, Ciesla K, Ozdemir G, Vekslar R, Amedi A iScience. 2024; 27(6):109820.

PMID: 38799571 PMC: 11126990. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109820.


Feasibility of Virtual Reality-Based Auditory Localization Training With Binaurally Recorded Auditory Stimuli for Patients With Single-Sided Deafness.

Shim L, Lee J, Han J, Jeon H, Hong S, Lee H Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 16(3):217-224.

PMID: 37080730 PMC: 10471910. DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2023.00206.


Interaural time difference sensitivity under binaural cochlear implant stimulation persists at high pulse rates up to 900 pps.

Buck A, Buchholz S, Schnupp J, Rosskothen-Kuhl N Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):3785.

PMID: 36882473 PMC: 9992369. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30569-0.


References
1.
Radeau M, Bertelson P . The after-effects of ventriloquism. Q J Exp Psychol. 1974; 26(1):63-71. DOI: 10.1080/14640747408400388. View

2.
Kumpik D, Roberts H, King A, Bizley J . Visual sensitivity is a stronger determinant of illusory processes than auditory cue parameters in the sound-induced flash illusion. J Vis. 2014; 14(7). PMC: 4070624. DOI: 10.1167/14.7.12. View

3.
Bertini C, Leo F, Avenanti A, Ladavas E . Independent mechanisms for ventriloquism and multisensory integration as revealed by theta-burst stimulation. Eur J Neurosci. 2010; 31(10):1791-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07200.x. View

4.
Isaiah A, Vongpaisal T, King A, Hartley D . Multisensory training improves auditory spatial processing following bilateral cochlear implantation. J Neurosci. 2014; 34(33):11119-30. PMC: 4131019. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4767-13.2014. View

5.
Wightman F, Kistler D . The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992; 91(3):1648-61. DOI: 10.1121/1.402445. View