Effectiveness of a Multilevel Intervention to Reduce Violence and Increase Condom Use in Intimate Partnerships Among Female Sex Workers: Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial in Karnataka, India

Overview

Journal BMJ Glob Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2019 Dec 5

PMID 31798984

Citations 7

Authors

Prakash Javalkar

Lucy Platt

Ravi Prakash

Tara S Beattie

Martine Collumbien

Mitzy Gafos

Satyanarayana Ramanaik

Calum Davey

Rachel Jewkes

Charlotte Watts

Parinita Bhattacharjee

Raghavendra Thalinja

Kavitha Dl

Shajy Isac

Lori Heise

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Samvedana Plus is a multilevel intervention working with sex workers, their intimate partners (IPs) and communities to reduce intimate partner violence (IPV) and to increase condom use within intimate relationships of sex workers in Northern Karnataka, India.

Methods: A cluster randomised controlled trial in 47 villages. Female sex workers with IPs in the last 6 months were eligible for baseline (2014), midline (2016) and endline (2017) surveys. 24 villages were randomised to Samvedana Plus and 23 to a wait-list control. Primary outcomes among sex workers included experience of physical and/or sexual IPV or severe physical/sexual IPV in the last 6 months and consistent condom use with their IP in past 30 days. Analyses adjusted for clustering and baseline cluster-level means of outcomes.

Result: Baseline (n=620) imbalance was observed with respect to age (33.9 vs 35.2) and IPV (31.4% vs 45.0%). No differences in physical/sexual IPV (8.1% vs 9.0%), severe physical/sexual IPV (6.9% vs 8.7%) or consistent condom use with IPs (62.5% vs 57.3%) were observed by trial arm at end line (n=547). Samvedana Plus was associated with decreased acceptance of IPV (adjusted OR (AOR)=0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.94, p=0.025), increased awareness of self-protection strategies (AOR=1.73, 95% CI=1.04-2.89, p=0.035) and solidarity of sex workers around issues of IPV (AOR=1.69, 95% CI=1.02-2.82, p=0.042). We observed an increase in IPV between baseline (25.9%) and midline (63.5%) among women in Samvedana Plus villages but lower in comparison villages (41.8%-44.3%) and a sharp decrease at end line in both arms (~8%).

Conclusion: We found no evidence that Samvedana Plus reduced IPV or increased condom use, but it may impact acceptance of IPV, increase knowledge of self-protection strategies and increase sex worker solidarity. Inconsistencies in reported IPV undermined the ability of the trial to assess effectiveness.

Trial Registration Number: NCT02807259.

Citing Articles

Integrated domestic violence and reproductive health interventions in India: a systematic review.

Sabri B, Mani S, Kaduluri V Reprod Health. 2024; 21(1):94.

PMID: 38951870 PMC: 11218333. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01830-0.

Interventions to Prevent Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alsina E, Browne J, Gielkens D, Noorman M, de Wit J Violence Against Women. 2023; 30(3-4):953-980.

PMID: 37475456 PMC: 10845820. DOI: 10.1177/10778012231183660.

A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Community-Based Intimate Partner Violence Interventions in India.

Mittal M, McCormick A, Palit M, Trabold N, Spencer C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(7).

PMID: 37047893 PMC: 10093839. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20075277.

Relationships Between Stigma and Intimate Partner Violence Among Female Sex Workers Living With HIV: Social and Economic Exclusion.

Rock A, McNaughton Reyes H, Go V, Maman S, Perez M, Donastorg Y Violence Against Women. 2022; 29(11):1971-1997.

PMID: 36344251 PMC: 10387732. DOI: 10.1177/10778012221127722.

Intertwined epidemics: progress, gaps, and opportunities to address intimate partner violence and HIV among key populations of women.

El-Bassel N, Mukherjee T, Stoicescu C, Starbird L, Stockman J, Frye V Lancet HIV. 2022; 9(3):e202-e213.

PMID: 35151376 PMC: 10009883. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00325-8.

References

Campbell J . Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet. 2002; 359(9314):1331-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08336-8. View

Javalkar P, Platt L, Prakash R, Beattie T, Bhattacharjee P, Thalinja R . What determines violence among female sex workers in an intimate partner relationship? Findings from North Karnataka, south India. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(1):350. PMC: 6440026. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6673-9. View

Blanchard J, ONeil J, Ramesh B, Bhattacharjee P, Orchard T, Moses S . Understanding the social and cultural contexts of female sex workers in Karnataka, India: implications for prevention of HIV infection. J Infect Dis. 2005; 191 Suppl 1:S139-46. DOI: 10.1086/425273. View

Edwards V, Black M, Dhingra S, McKnight-Eily L, Perry G . Physical and sexual intimate partner violence and reported serious psychological distress in the 2007 BRFSS. Int J Public Health. 2009; 54 Suppl 1:37-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-009-0005-2. View

Beattie T, Bhattacharjee P, Ramesh B, Gurnani V, Anthony J, Isac S . Violence against female sex workers in Karnataka state, south India: impact on health, and reductions in violence following an intervention program. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10:476. PMC: 2931467. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-476. View

Syvertsen J, Robertson A, Abramovitz D, Rangel M, Martinez G, Patterson T . Study protocol for the recruitment of female sex workers and their non-commercial partners into couple-based HIV research. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:136. PMC: 3359230. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-136. View

Hoke T, Feldblum P, Van Damme K, Nasution M, Grey T, Wong E . Randomised controlled trial of alternative male and female condom promotion strategies targeting sex workers in Madagascar. Sex Transm Infect. 2007; 83(6):448-53. PMC: 2598714. DOI: 10.1136/sti.2006.024612. View

Wagman J, H Gray R, Campbell J, Thoma M, Ndyanabo A, Ssekasanvu J . Effectiveness of an integrated intimate partner violence and HIV prevention intervention in Rakai, Uganda: analysis of an intervention in an existing cluster randomised cohort. Lancet Glob Health. 2014; 3(1):e23-33. PMC: 4370228. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70344-4. View

Reed E, Erausquin J, Groves A, Salazar M, Biradavolu M, Blankenship K . Client-perpetrated and husband-perpetrated violence among female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, India: HIV/STI risk across personal and work contexts. Sex Transm Infect. 2016; 92(6):424-9. PMC: 4992639. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052162. View

10.

Jewkes R, Nduna M, Levin J, Jama N, Dunkle K, Puren A . Impact of stepping stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behaviour in rural South Africa: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008; 337:a506. PMC: 2505093. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a506. View

11.

Murray L, Moreno L, Rosario S, Ellen J, Sweat M, Kerrigan D . The role of relationship intimacy in consistent condom use among female sex workers and their regular paying partners in the Dominican Republic. AIDS Behav. 2006; 11(3):463-70. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-006-9184-5. View

12.

Beksinska A, Prakash R, Isac S, Mohan H, Platt L, Blanchard J . Violence experience by perpetrator and associations with HIV/STI risk and infection: a cross-sectional study among female sex workers in Karnataka, south India. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(9):e021389. PMC: 6144389. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021389. View

13.

Cornish F, Ghosh R . The necessary contradictions of 'community-led' health promotion: a case study of HIV prevention in an Indian red light district. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 64(2):496-507. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.09.009. View

14.

Bhattacharjee P, Campbell L, Thalinja R, Nair S, Doddamane M, Ramanaik S . Understanding the Relationship Between Female Sex Workers and Their Intimate Partners: Lessons and Initial Findings From Participatory Research in North Karnataka, South India. Health Educ Behav. 2018; 45(5):824-835. PMC: 6139989. DOI: 10.1177/1090198118763934. View

15.

Ulibarri M, Strathdee S, Lozada R, Magis-Rodriguez C, Amaro H, OCampo P . Intimate Partner Violence among Female Sex Workers in Two Mexico-U.S. Border Cities: Partner Characteristics and HIV Risk-behaviors as Correlates of Abuse. Psychol Trauma. 2011; 2(4):318-325. PMC: 3083072. DOI: 10.1037/a0017500. View

16.

Schraiber L, Latorre M, Franca Jr I, Segri N, dOliveira A . Validity of the WHO VAW study instrument for estimating gender-based violence against women. Rev Saude Publica. 2010; 44(4):658-66. DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89102010000400009. View

17.

Argento E, Muldoon K, Duff P, Simo A, Deering K, Shannon K . High prevalence and partner correlates of physical and sexual violence by intimate partners among street and off-street sex workers. PLoS One. 2014; 9(7):e102129. PMC: 4092091. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102129. View

18.

Patterson T, Mausbach B, Lozada R, Staines-Orozco H, Semple S, Fraga-Vallejo M . Efficacy of a brief behavioral intervention to promote condom use among female sex workers in Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98(11):2051-7. PMC: 2633868. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.130096. View

19.

Parcesepe A, L Engle K, Martin S, Green S, Sinkele W, Suchindran C . The impact of an alcohol harm reduction intervention on interpersonal violence and engagement in sex work among female sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016; 161:21-8. PMC: 4936780. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.037. View

20.

El-Bassel N, Witte S, Wada T, Gilbert L, Wallace J . Correlates of partner violence among female street-based sex workers: substance abuse, history of childhood abuse, and HIV risks. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2001; 15(1):41-51. DOI: 10.1089/108729101460092. View