» Articles » PMID: 31798340

Factors Associated with Job Satisfaction Among Graduate Nursing Faculties in Nepal

Overview
Journal BMC Nurs
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2019 Dec 5
PMID 31798340
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Job satisfaction among nursing faculty is critical to improving quality of nursing education, producing future nurses who will contribute directly to the health of patients at a local and national level. This study explores factors associated with job satisfaction among graduate nursing faculties in different universities of Nepal.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among nursing faculty with at least one year of teaching in their respective institutions. A 36-items job satisfaction questionnaire with 6-point Likert type responses was administered online. The questionnaire was pre-tested with 30 faculties pooled from multiple institutions. Link to the final survey was sent via e-mail to 327 nursing faculties working in 39 nursing colleges. Respondents were contacted by phone as a follow up to the email to politely remind them about the survey. Data analysis was carried out with SAS University Edition software. Chi-Square test and t-test were used for simple descriptive analysis. A multivariate binary logistic regression model was used to identify the significant factors associated with nursing faculties' job satisfaction. Adjusted odds ratio was calculated and significance was considered at  ≤ 0.05 with 95% confidence interval.

Results: The response rate was 54.4%. After retrospective cleaning of data, usable response rate was 52.3% ( = 171). The average age of the nursing faculties was 36.8 ± 7.0 years. Based on the overall job satisfaction score, 36.8% nursing faculties were satisfied with their current job. The coefficient for Cronbach's alpha was 0.895 suggesting very good reliability of the overall measure. The significant factors associated with job satisfaction were the involvement of the faculties in decision making process related to the department (OR = 4.83) and adequate access to reference materials (OR = 2.90).

Conclusions: This study suggests that nursing faculties have positive attitude towards their job but are dissatisfied with the benefits offered to them and the operating condition of their institutions. Expanding the teaching learning resources, such as reference books, subscription to journals, and continuing education opportunities for nursing faculties through participation in professional meetings would be helpful in improving the quality of nursing education in Nepal.

Citing Articles

Predictors of Job Satisfaction and Association with Psychological Distress Among Academic Medicine Faculty in Kazakhstan.

Uristemova A, Myssayev A, Meirmanov S, Migina L Med Lav. 2024; 115(1):e2024002.

PMID: 38411979 PMC: 10915675. DOI: 10.23749/mdl.v115i1.15010.


The physiotherapy workforce in Nepal: A national survey.

Nepal G, Acharya R, Coppieters M, Bimali I, Poudel S, Chaudhary B J Eval Clin Pract. 2022; 29(1):69-82.

PMID: 35822869 PMC: 10084353. DOI: 10.1111/jep.13729.

References
1.
Disch J, Edwardson S, Adwan J . Nursing faculty satisfaction with individual, institutional, and leadership factors. J Prof Nurs. 2004; 20(5):323-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.07.011. View

2.
Hayne A, Gerhardt C, Davis J . Filipino nurses in the United States: recruitment, retention, occupational stress, and job satisfaction. J Transcult Nurs. 2009; 20(3):313-22. DOI: 10.1177/1043659609334927. View

3.
Spence Laschinger H . Job and career satisfaction and turnover intentions of newly graduated nurses. J Nurs Manag. 2012; 20(4):472-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01293.x. View

4.
Barrett M, Goldenberg D, Faux S . Career patterns and job satisfaction of Canadian nurse educators. J Adv Nurs. 1992; 17(8):1002-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb02030.x. View

5.
Al-Hussami M, Saleh M, Abdalkader R, Mahadeen A . Predictors of nursing faculty members' organizational commitment in governmental universities. J Nurs Manag. 2011; 19(4):556-66. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01148.x. View