A Cross-sectional Study on Feather Cover Damage in Canadian Laying Hens in Non-cage Housing Systems
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Feather damage (FD) resulting from feather pecking remains a concern in non-cage housing systems for laying hens worldwide. This study aimed to identify bird-, housing-, and management-related factors associated with FD in non-cage housing systems as the egg production sector phases out the conventional cage system in Canada. A survey on housing and management practices was developed and distributed to 122 laying hen farms where 39 respondents provided information on non-cage flocks. Farmers visually assessed 50 birds throughout the barn for FD using a 0-2 scoring scale according to severity. Prevalence of FD was calculated as the percentage of birds with any form of FD (score > 0). Multivariable linear regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with FD prevalence.
Results: Six variables were included in the final model and accounted for 64% of the variation in FD between farms. FD prevalence was higher with increasing flock age (0.9% ± 0.29) and when birds were housed in all wire/slatted barns compared with all litter barns (37.6% ± 13.1). Additionally, FD prevalence tended to be higher in barns with manure removal only after depopulation (20.1% ± 10.70). Enrichment also tended to be associated with higher FD (19.1% ± 8.04), possibly indicating that it was provided after FD was observed as a control measure, or, was not efficient in reducing the development of FD.
Conclusions: These findings emphasize the role of litter provision and management (e.g., manure removal effects on air quality), and its potential impact on FD among laying hens in non-cage housing systems in Canada. Further longitudinal and/or intervention studies are needed to assess the potential of the identified factors to function as a management strategy to prevent or reduce FD in non-cage housed laying hens.
Genetic parameter estimates for the use of an aviary with winter garden by laying hens.
Makanjuola B, Gebhardt-Henrich S, Toscano M, Baes C Poult Sci. 2024; 103(3):103369.
PMID: 38242054 PMC: 10828583. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103369.
He S, Lin J, Jin Q, Ma X, Liu Z, Chen H Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(16).
PMID: 36009680 PMC: 9405104. DOI: 10.3390/ani12162090.
Effect of Providing Environmental Enrichment into Aviary House on the Welfare of Laying Hens.
Son J, Lee W, Kim H, Kang B, Kang H Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(9).
PMID: 35565591 PMC: 9103546. DOI: 10.3390/ani12091165.
The Impact of Probiotic on Injurious Behavior in Laying Hens.
Jiang S, Hu J, Cheng H Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(7).
PMID: 35405859 PMC: 8997090. DOI: 10.3390/ani12070870.
The Prevalence of Integument Injuries and Associated Risk Factors Among Canadian Turkeys.
Leishman E, van Staaveren N, Osborne V, Wood B, Baes C, Harlander-Matauschek A Front Vet Sci. 2022; 8:757776.
PMID: 35071378 PMC: 8777054. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.757776.