» Articles » PMID: 31796015

A Cross-sectional Study on Feather Cover Damage in Canadian Laying Hens in Non-cage Housing Systems

Overview
Journal BMC Vet Res
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Dec 5
PMID 31796015
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Feather damage (FD) resulting from feather pecking remains a concern in non-cage housing systems for laying hens worldwide. This study aimed to identify bird-, housing-, and management-related factors associated with FD in non-cage housing systems as the egg production sector phases out the conventional cage system in Canada. A survey on housing and management practices was developed and distributed to 122 laying hen farms where 39 respondents provided information on non-cage flocks. Farmers visually assessed 50 birds throughout the barn for FD using a 0-2 scoring scale according to severity. Prevalence of FD was calculated as the percentage of birds with any form of FD (score > 0). Multivariable linear regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with FD prevalence.

Results: Six variables were included in the final model and accounted for 64% of the variation in FD between farms. FD prevalence was higher with increasing flock age (0.9% ± 0.29) and when birds were housed in all wire/slatted barns compared with all litter barns (37.6% ± 13.1). Additionally, FD prevalence tended to be higher in barns with manure removal only after depopulation (20.1% ± 10.70). Enrichment also tended to be associated with higher FD (19.1% ± 8.04), possibly indicating that it was provided after FD was observed as a control measure, or, was not efficient in reducing the development of FD.

Conclusions: These findings emphasize the role of litter provision and management (e.g., manure removal effects on air quality), and its potential impact on FD among laying hens in non-cage housing systems in Canada. Further longitudinal and/or intervention studies are needed to assess the potential of the identified factors to function as a management strategy to prevent or reduce FD in non-cage housed laying hens.

Citing Articles

Genetic parameter estimates for the use of an aviary with winter garden by laying hens.

Makanjuola B, Gebhardt-Henrich S, Toscano M, Baes C Poult Sci. 2024; 103(3):103369.

PMID: 38242054 PMC: 10828583. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103369.


The Relationship between Animal Welfare and Farm Profitability in Cage and Free-Range Housing Systems for Laying Hens in China.

He S, Lin J, Jin Q, Ma X, Liu Z, Chen H Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(16).

PMID: 36009680 PMC: 9405104. DOI: 10.3390/ani12162090.


Effect of Providing Environmental Enrichment into Aviary House on the Welfare of Laying Hens.

Son J, Lee W, Kim H, Kang B, Kang H Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(9).

PMID: 35565591 PMC: 9103546. DOI: 10.3390/ani12091165.


The Impact of Probiotic on Injurious Behavior in Laying Hens.

Jiang S, Hu J, Cheng H Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(7).

PMID: 35405859 PMC: 8997090. DOI: 10.3390/ani12070870.


The Prevalence of Integument Injuries and Associated Risk Factors Among Canadian Turkeys.

Leishman E, van Staaveren N, Osborne V, Wood B, Baes C, Harlander-Matauschek A Front Vet Sci. 2022; 8:757776.

PMID: 35071378 PMC: 8777054. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.757776.


References
1.
Drake K, Donnelly C, Stamp Dawkins M . Influence of rearing and lay risk factors on propensity for feather damage in laying hens. Br Poult Sci. 2010; 51(6):725-33. DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2010.528751. View

2.
Anderson D, Beard C, Hanson R . Influence of poultry house dust, ammonia, and carbon dioxide on the resistance of chickens to Newcastle disease virus. Avian Dis. 1966; 10(2):177-88. View

3.
Bilcik B, Keeling L . Changes in feather condition in relation to feather pecking and aggressive behaviour in laying hens. Br Poult Sci. 1999; 40(4):444-51. DOI: 10.1080/00071669987188. View

4.
Gunnarsson S, Keeling L, Svedberg J . Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of floor eggs, cloacal cannibalism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of loose housed laying hens. Br Poult Sci. 1999; 40(1):12-8. DOI: 10.1080/00071669987773. View

5.
Heerkens J, Delezie E, Kempen I, Zoons J, Ampe B, Rodenburg T . Specific characteristics of the aviary housing system affect plumage condition, mortality and production in laying hens. Poult Sci. 2015; 94(9):2008-17. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pev187. View