» Articles » PMID: 31795706

Octave Band Noise Exposure: Laboratory Models and Otoprotection Efforts

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2019 Dec 5
PMID 31795706
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With advances in the understanding of mechanisms of noise injury, the past 30 years have brought numerous efforts to identify drugs that prevent noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). The diverse protocols used across investigations have made comparisons across drugs difficult. A systematic review of the literature by Hammill [(2017). Doctoral thesis, The University of Texas at Austin] identified original reports of chemical interventions to prevent or treat hearing loss caused by noise exposure. An initial search returned 3492 articles. After excluding duplicate articles and articles that did not meet the systematic review inclusion criteria, a total of 213 studies published between 1977 and 2016 remained. Reference information, noise exposure parameters, species, sex, method of NIHL assessment, and pharmaceutical intervention details for these 213 studies were entered into a database. Frequency-specific threshold shifts in control animals (i.e., in the absence of pharmaceutical intervention) are reported here. Specific patterns of hearing loss as a function of species and noise exposure parameters are provided to facilitate the selection of appropriate pre-clinical models. The emphasis of this report is octave band noise exposure, as this is one of the most common exposure protocols across pharmacological otoprotection studies.

Citing Articles

Virally-Mediated Enhancement of Efferent Inhibition Reduces Acoustic Trauma in Wild Type Murine Cochleas.

Slika E, Fuchs P, Wood M bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39314296 PMC: 11419007. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.12.612688.


Effects of Astragaloside IV on Hearing, Inflammatory Factors, and Intestinal Flora in Mice Exposed to Noise.

Li J, Yang J, Xia Y, Wang J, Xia Y Metabolites. 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38393014 PMC: 10890247. DOI: 10.3390/metabo14020122.


Investigational Medicinal Products for the Inner Ear: Review of Clinical Trial Characteristics in ClinicalTrials.gov.

Le Prell C J Am Acad Audiol. 2022; 32(10):670-694.

PMID: 35609594 PMC: 9129919. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735522.


What's the buzz? The neuroscience and the treatment of tinnitus.

Henton A, Tzounopoulos T Physiol Rev. 2021; 101(4):1609-1632.

PMID: 33769102 PMC: 8576365. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2020.


Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and its Prevention: Current Issues in Mammalian Hearing.

Le Prell C, Hackett T, Ramachandran R Curr Opin Physiol. 2020; 18:32-36.

PMID: 32984667 PMC: 7511084. DOI: 10.1016/j.cophys.2020.07.004.


References
1.
Mohammadkhani G, Pourbakht A, Khanavi M, Faghihzadeh S . Protective effect of silymarin on noise-induced hearing loss in Guinea pigs. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014; 15(11):e8890. PMC: 3971782. DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.8890. View

2.
Bielefeld E, Harrison R, DeBacker J . Pharmaceutical otoprotection strategies to prevent impulse noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019; 146(5):3790. DOI: 10.1121/1.5132285. View

3.
Stebbins W, Moody D, Serafin J . Some principal issues in the analysis of noise effects on hearing in experimental animals. Am J Otolaryngol. 1982; 3(4):295-304. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0709(82)80069-0. View

4.
Henderson D, Hamernik R . Impulse noise: critical review. J Acoust Soc Am. 1986; 80(2):569-84. DOI: 10.1121/1.394052. View

5.
Coleman J, Huang X, Liu J, Kopke R, Jackson R . Dosing study on the effectiveness of salicylate/N-acetylcysteine for prevention of noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health. 2010; 12(48):159-65. DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.64972. View