» Articles » PMID: 31795499

Amitosenescence and Pseudomitosenescence: Putative New Players in the Aging Process

Overview
Journal Cells
Publisher MDPI
Date 2019 Dec 5
PMID 31795499
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Replicative senescence has initially been defined as a stress reaction of replication-competent cultured cells in vitro, resulting in an ultimate cell cycle arrest at preserved growth and viability. Classically, it has been linked to critical telomere curtailment following repetitive cell divisions, and later described as a response to oncogenes and other stressors. Currently, there are compelling new directions indicating that a comparable state of cellular senescence might be adopted also by postmitotic cell entities, including terminally differentiated neurons. However, the cellular upstream inducers and molecular downstream cues mediating a senescence-like state in neurons (amitosenescence) are ill-defined. Here, we address the phenomenon of abortive atypical cell cycle activity in light of amitosenescence, and discuss why such replicative reprogramming might provide a yet unconsidered source to explain senescence in maturated neurons. We also hypothesize the existence of a G subphase as a priming factor for cell cycle re-entry, in analogy to discoveries in quiescent muscle stem cells. In conclusion, we propose a revision of our current view on the process and definition of senescence by encompassing a primarily replication-incompetent state (amitosenescence), which might be expanded by events of atypical cell cycle activity (pseudomitosenescence).

Citing Articles

Decoding senescence of aging single cells at the nexus of biomaterials, microfluidics, and spatial omics.

Venkataraman A, Kordic I, Li J, Zhang N, Bharadwaj N, Fang Z NPJ Aging. 2024; 10(1):57.

PMID: 39592596 PMC: 11599402. DOI: 10.1038/s41514-024-00178-w.


Cellular senescence in Alzheimer's disease: from physiology to pathology.

Zhu J, Wu C, Yang L Transl Neurodegener. 2024; 13(1):55.

PMID: 39568081 PMC: 11577763. DOI: 10.1186/s40035-024-00447-4.


Lamin B1 as a key modulator of the developing and aging brain.

Koufi F, Neri I, Ramazzotti G, Rusciano I, Mongiorgi S, Marvi M Front Cell Neurosci. 2023; 17:1263310.

PMID: 37720548 PMC: 10501396. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2023.1263310.


Senescence: a double-edged sword in beta-cell health and failure?.

Varghese S, Dhawan S Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1196460.

PMID: 37229454 PMC: 10203573. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1196460.


DNA Damage Response-Associated Cell Cycle Re-Entry and Neuronal Senescence in Brain Aging and Alzheimer's Disease.

Wong G, Chow K J Alzheimers Dis. 2022; 94(s1):S429-S451.

PMID: 35848025 PMC: 10473156. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-220203.


References
1.
Jurk D, Wang C, Miwa S, Maddick M, Korolchuk V, Tsolou A . Postmitotic neurons develop a p21-dependent senescence-like phenotype driven by a DNA damage response. Aging Cell. 2012; 11(6):996-1004. PMC: 3533793. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00870.x. View

2.
Welty S, Teng Y, Liang Z, Zhao W, Sanders L, Greenamyre J . RAD52 is required for RNA-templated recombination repair in post-mitotic neurons. J Biol Chem. 2017; 293(4):1353-1362. PMC: 5787811. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M117.808402. View

3.
Pozniak C, Barnabe-Heider F, Rymar V, Lee A, Sadikot A, Miller F . p73 is required for survival and maintenance of CNS neurons. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(22):9800-9. PMC: 6757829. View

4.
Ohashi M, Korsakova E, Allen D, Lee P, Fu K, Vargas B . Loss of MECP2 Leads to Activation of P53 and Neuronal Senescence. Stem Cell Reports. 2018; 10(5):1453-1463. PMC: 5995366. DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.04.001. View

5.
Weichhart T . mTOR as Regulator of Lifespan, Aging, and Cellular Senescence: A Mini-Review. Gerontology. 2017; 64(2):127-134. PMC: 6089343. DOI: 10.1159/000484629. View