» Articles » PMID: 31792620

Current Update on Treatment Strategies for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Dec 4
PMID 31792620
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a surgically treatable neurological disorder of the elderly population that is characterized by abnormal ventricular enlargement due to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) accumulation and gait disturbance, cognitive impairment, or urinary incontinence. The objective of this review is to present the current diagnostic and treatment approaches for iNPH and to discuss some of the postoperative modalities that complement positive surgical outcomes.

Recent Findings: Although historically reported patient outcomes following iNPH surgery were dismal and highly variable, recent advances in terms of better understanding of the iNPH disease process, better standardization of iNPH diagnostic and treatment processes arising from the adoption of clinical guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and in research methodologies, and availability of long-term follow-up data, have helped reduce the variations to a much improved 73 to 96% reported good outcomes. With careful evaluation, good patient selection, and advanced surgical techniques, iNPH can be surgically treated to return patients close to their pre-iNPH functional status. Institution of an interdisciplinary effort to rehabilitate patients following surgery may help augment their recovery.

Citing Articles

A Rare Case of Shunt Malfunction Due to the Needle Guard Coming Off During Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Surgery.

Ono H, Kaji T, Morishima H, Nagashima G Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72228.

PMID: 39445046 PMC: 11498944. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72228.


Falciform technique in laparoscopic revision of distal catheter obstruction: an evaluation.

Nguyen T, Tran Q, Pham V Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024; 86(6):3310-3314.

PMID: 38846879 PMC: 11152875. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002066.


Structural neuroimaging markers of normal pressure hydrocephalus versus Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinson's disease, and hydrocephalus versus atrophy in chronic TBI-a narrative review.

Kadaba Sridhar S, Dysterheft Robb J, Gupta R, Cheong S, Kuang R, Samadani U Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1347200.

PMID: 38576534 PMC: 10991762. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1347200.


Lumboperitoneal shunt and ventriculoperitoneal shunt for chronic hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a comparison.

Li X, Wang Y, Xia B, Che H, Yan Z Front Surg. 2024; 11:1368493.

PMID: 38533091 PMC: 10963422. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1368493.


Comparing the Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes of Lumbo-Peritoneal, Ventriculo-Peritoneal, or Non-Shunting Treatment after Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

Chiu C, Chiu P, Wu C, Yip H, Chiu Y, Ji H Int J Med Sci. 2024; 21(4):656-663.

PMID: 38464824 PMC: 10920851. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.92032.


References
1.
Hakim S, Adams R . The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci. 1965; 2(4):307-27. DOI: 10.1016/0022-510x(65)90016-x. View

2.
Szajer J, Russo R, Mansberg R . Ventriculopleural Shunt Dysfunction Due to a Loculated Pleural Collection Demonstrated on SPECT/CT Imaging. Clin Nucl Med. 2017; 43(2):144-146. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001956. View

3.
Tomita T . Placement of a ventriculoatrial shunt using external jugular catheterization: technical note. Neurosurgery. 1984; 14(1):74-5. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-198401000-00017. View

4.
Saito M, Nishio Y, Kanno S, Uchiyama M, Hayashi A, Takagi M . Cognitive profile of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2011; 1(1):202-11. PMC: 3199897. DOI: 10.1159/000328924. View

5.
Marmarou A, Young H, Aygok G, Sawauchi S, Tsuji O, Yamamoto T . Diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective study in 151 patients. J Neurosurg. 2005; 102(6):987-97. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.6.0987. View