» Articles » PMID: 31789131

Swept-Tone Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Human Newborns

Overview
Journal Trends Hear
Date 2019 Dec 3
PMID 31789131
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several types of otoacoustic emissions have been characterized in newborns to study the maturational status of the cochlea at birth and to develop effective tests of hearing. The stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission (SFOAE), a reflection-type emission elicited with a single low-level pure tone, is the least studied of these emissions and has not been comprehensively characterized in human newborns. The SFOAE has been linked to cochlear tuning and is sensitive to disruptions in cochlear gain (i.e., hearing loss) in adult subjects. In this study, we characterize SFOAEs evoked with rapidly sweeping tones in human neonates and consider the implications of our findings for human cochlear maturation. SFOAEs were measured in 29 term newborns within 72 hr of birth using swept tones presented at 2 oct/s across a four-octave frequency range (0.5–8 kHz); 20 normal-hearing young adults served as a control group. The prevalence of SFOAEs in newborns was as high as 90% (depending on how response “presence” was defined). Evidence of probe-tip leakage and abnormal ear-canal energy reflectance was observed in those ears with absent or unmeasurable SFOAEs. Results in the group of newborns with present stimulus-frequency emissions indicate that neonatal swept-tone SFOAEs are adult-like in morphology but have slightly higher amplitude compared with adults and longer SFOAE group delays. The origin of these nonadult-like features is probably mixed, including contributions from both conductive (ear canal and middle ear) and cochlear immaturities.

Citing Articles

Detection of mild sensory hearing loss using a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile.

Abdala C, Benjamin T, Stiepan S, Luo P, Shera C J Acoust Soc Am. 2024; 156(4):2220-2236.

PMID: 39377529 PMC: 11464069. DOI: 10.1121/10.0030399.


Swept Along: Measuring Otoacoustic Emissions Using Continuously Varying Stimuli.

Shera C J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024; 25(2):91-102.

PMID: 38409555 PMC: 11018600. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-024-00934-5.


Objective Assessment System for Hearing Prediction Based on Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.

Gong Q, Liu Y, Xu R, Liang D, Peng Z, Yang H Trends Hear. 2021; 25:23312165211059628.

PMID: 34817273 PMC: 8738859. DOI: 10.1177/23312165211059628.

References
1.
Keefe D, Bulen J, Arehart K, Burns E . Ear-canal impedance and reflection coefficient in human infants and adults. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993; 94(5):2617-38. DOI: 10.1121/1.407347. View

2.
Shera C, Guinan Jr J . Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003; 113(5):2762-72. DOI: 10.1121/1.1557211. View

3.
Abdala C, Luo P, Shera C . Optimizing swept-tone protocols for recording distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults and newborns. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016; 138(6):3785-99. PMC: 4691260. DOI: 10.1121/1.4937611. View

4.
Kalluri R, Shera C . Measuring stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions using swept tones. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013; 134(1):356-68. PMC: 3732205. DOI: 10.1121/1.4807505. View

5.
Scheperle R, Neely S, Kopun J, Gorga M . Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008; 124(1):288-300. PMC: 2562746. DOI: 10.1121/1.2931953. View