» Articles » PMID: 31781877

Radical Cystectomy in Female Patients - Improving Outcomes

Overview
Journal Curr Urol Rep
Publisher Current Science
Specialty Urology
Date 2019 Nov 30
PMID 31781877
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: To review the methods of improving surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes in women with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy.

Recent Findings: Οrthotopic urinary diversion (ONB) is a safe option for well-selected women as it combines high rates of daytime and nighttime continence with exceptional oncologic outcomes. It is considered safe even for patients with limited lymph node disease and trigone involvement, as long as a preoperative biopsy of the bladder neck or an intraoperative frozen section analysis of distal urethral margin rules out malignant disease. Nerve-sparing techniques have shown promising results. For well-selected patients with early invasive disease, sparing of internal genitalia has proven to be oncologically safe. Yet, generally accepted and evidence-based oncological and functional follow-up schemes for women after radical cystectomy are still lacking. Properly designed prospective studies are needed with adequate number of participants in order to safely conclude about a broader use of pelvic organ-sparing cystectomy.

Citing Articles

Utilizing vaginal natural orifice to facilitate bowel manipulation during totally intracorporeal ileal conduit construction: a retrospective cohort study.

Jia K, Huang S, Wang Z, Lin Y, Bai Y, Shen C Ann Med. 2025; 57(1):2453827.

PMID: 39826911 PMC: 11748861. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2453827.


Mini-Review: Current Bladder Cancer Treatment-The Need for Improvement.

Gill E, Perks C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(3).

PMID: 38338835 PMC: 10855537. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25031557.

References
1.
Lee C, Hafez K, Sheffield J, Joshi D, Montie J . Orthotopic bladder substitution in women: nontraditional applications. J Urol. 2004; 171(4):1585-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000116547.75199.44. View

2.
Koppie T, Vickers A, Vora K, Dalbagni G, Bochner B . Standardization of pelvic lymphadenectomy performed at radical cystectomy: can we establish a minimum number of lymph nodes that should be removed?. Cancer. 2006; 107(10):2368-74. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22250. View

3.
Cho K, Seo J, Park S, Lee Y, Choi Y, Cho N . The risk factor for urethral recurrence after radical cystectomy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Urol Int. 2009; 82(3):306-11. DOI: 10.1159/000209363. View

4.
Gakis G, Schilling D, Perner S, Schwentner C, Sievert K, Stenzl A . Sequential resection of malignant ureteral margins at radical cystectomy: a critical assessment of the value of frozen section analysis. World J Urol. 2010; 29(4):451-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0581-z. View

5.
Kluth L, Rieken M, Xylinas E, Kent M, Rink M, Roupret M . Gender-specific differences in clinicopathologic outcomes following radical cystectomy: an international multi-institutional study of more than 8000 patients. Eur Urol. 2013; 66(5):913-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.040. View