» Articles » PMID: 31781393

The Underpinnings of Ageism: Multiple Mediational Model of Epistemological Style, Social Dominance Orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism, and Ageist Attitudes

Overview
Journal J Aging Res
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2019 Nov 30
PMID 31781393
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study seeks to understand the psychological factors that may contribute to the development and endorsement of ageist belief systems. Dual process theory is used to examine how one's worldview, beliefs in social hierarchy, authoritarian aggression, authoritarian submission, and conventionalism predict ageist attitudes. Participants living in the United States ( = 407) in 49 states and territories were recruited through this online national study and completed surveys of their ageist beliefs, epistemological style, social dominance orientation (SDO), and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA). RWA, SDO, and naïve realism were all positively associated with ageist beliefs. A hypothesized path model and two alternative models suggested the retention of a model whereby naïve realism led to RWA, which led to SDO, and finally to ageism. All possible direct and indirect effects were significant within the retained model, suggesting the presence of a multiple mediation. The fit of this model was superior to that of models testing alternative theoretical causal chains. Naïve realism may lead to authoritarian aggression, authoritarian submission, and conventionalism, which may then increase the value that people place on social hierarchies, and this may influence the development and retention of ageist beliefs. Helping people to understand what their basic beliefs about the world are and how they may play a role in the development of ageism may assist in reducing ageist attitudes.

Citing Articles

Negative and positive ageism in an Italian sample: how ageist beliefs relate to epistemic trust, psychological distress, and well-being.

Fiorini Bincoletto A, Zanini L, Spitoni G, Lingiardi V Res Psychother. 2023; 26(2).

PMID: 37503673 PMC: 10483480. DOI: 10.4081/ripppo.2023.676.


Unpacking trust: The Italian validation of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ).

Liotti M, Milesi A, Spitoni G, Tanzilli A, Speranza A, Parolin L PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0280328.

PMID: 36701301 PMC: 9879475. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280328.


Ageism toward older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: Intergenerational conflict and support.

Sutter A, Vaswani M, Denice P, Choi K, Bouchard J, Esses V J Soc Issues. 2022; .

PMID: 36249557 PMC: 9538750. DOI: 10.1111/josi.12554.


The Discriminatory Potential of Modern Recruitment Trends-A Mixed-Method Study From Germany.

Kroll E, Veit S, Ziegler M Front Psychol. 2021; 12:634376.

PMID: 34759852 PMC: 8573412. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.634376.

References
1.
Schaie K . Ageism in psychological research. Am Psychol. 1988; 43(3):179-83. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.43.3.179. View

2.
North M, Fiske S . An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychol Bull. 2012; 138(5):982-97. PMC: 3838706. DOI: 10.1037/a0027843. View

3.
Duckitt J, Wagner C, du Plessis I, Birum I . The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002; 83(1):75-93. View

4.
Lamont R, Swift H, Abrams D . A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage. Psychol Aging. 2015; 30(1):180-193. PMC: 4360754. DOI: 10.1037/a0038586. View

5.
Eymard A, Douglas D . Ageism among health care providers and interventions to improve their attitudes toward older adults: an integrative review. J Gerontol Nurs. 2012; 38(5):26-35. DOI: 10.3928/00989134-20120307-09. View