Micropatterned Hydrogels and Cell Alignment Enhance the Odontogenic Potential of Stem Cells from Apical Papilla In-vitro

Overview

Journal Dent Mater

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2019 Nov 30

PMID 31780101

Citations 12

Authors

Michael Ha

Avathamsa Athirasala

Anthony Tahayeri

Paula P Menezes

Luiz E Bertassoni

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: An understanding of the extracellular matrix characteristics which stimulate and guide stem cell differentiation in the dental pulp is fundamental for the development of enhanced dental regenerative therapies. Our objectives, in this study, were to determine whether stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP) responded to substrate stiffness, whether hydrogels providing micropatterned topographical cues stimulate SCAP self-alignment, and whether the resulting alignment could influence their differentiation towards an odontogenic lineage in-vitro.

Methods: Experiments utilized gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels of increasing concentrations (5, 10 and 15%). We determined their compressive modulus via unconfined compression and analyzed cell spreading via F-actin/DAPI immunostaining. GelMA hydrogels were micropatterned using photolithography, in order to generate microgrooves and ridges of 60 and 120μm, onto which SCAP were seeded and analyzed for self-alignment via fluorescence microscopy. Lastly, we analyzed the odontogenic differentiation of SCAP using alkaline phosphatase protein expression (ANOVA/Tukey α=0.05).

Results: SCAP appeared to proliferate better on stiffer hydrogels. Both 60 and 120μm micropatterned hydrogels guided the self-alignment of SCAP with no significant difference between them. Similarly, both 60 and 120μm micropattern aligned cells promoted higher odontogenic differentiation than non-patterned controls.

Significance: In summary, both substrate mechanics and geometry have a statistically significant influence on SCAP response, and may assist in the odontogenic differentiation of dental stem cells. These results may point toward the fabrication of cell-guiding scaffolds for regenerative endodontics, and may provide cues regarding the development of the pulp-dentin interface during tooth formation.

Citing Articles

Beyond Needles: Immunomodulatory Hydrogel-Guided Vaccine Delivery Systems.

Rana M, Demirkaya C, De la Hoz Siegler H Gels. 2025; 11(1).

PMID: 39851978 PMC: 11764567. DOI: 10.3390/gels11010007.

Improving Antimicrobial Properties of GelMA Biocomposite Hydrogels for Regenerative Endodontic Treatment.

Dorterler O, Akgun B, Alper M, Ayhan F Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(12).

PMID: 38932026 PMC: 11207667. DOI: 10.3390/polym16121675.

Additively manufactured bioceramic scaffolds based on triply periodic minimal surfaces for bone regeneration.

Zhu H, Wang J, Wang S, Yang Y, Chen M, Luan Q J Tissue Eng. 2024; 15:20417314241244997.

PMID: 38617462 PMC: 11010742. DOI: 10.1177/20417314241244997.

Synthesis and Photopatterning of Synthetic Thiol-Norbornene Hydrogels.

Jalloh U, Gsell A, Gultian K, MacAulay J, Madden A, Smith J Gels. 2024; 10(3).

PMID: 38534582 PMC: 10970633. DOI: 10.3390/gels10030164.

The 3-dimensional printing for dental tissue regeneration: the state of the art and future challenges.

Zhao F, Zhang Z, Guo W Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1356580.

PMID: 38456006 PMC: 10917914. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1356580.

References

McBeath R, Pirone D, Nelson C, Bhadriraju K, Chen C . Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell. 2004; 6(4):483-95. DOI: 10.1016/s1534-5807(04)00075-9. View

Ingber D . Mechanical control of tissue growth: function follows form. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(33):11571-2. PMC: 1188017. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505939102. View

McWhorter F, Wang T, Nguyen P, Chung T, Liu W . Modulation of macrophage phenotype by cell shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(43):17253-8. PMC: 3808615. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1308887110. View

Huang G, Sonoyama W, Liu Y, Liu H, Wang S, Shi S . The hidden treasure in apical papilla: the potential role in pulp/dentin regeneration and bioroot engineering. J Endod. 2008; 34(6):645-51. PMC: 2653220. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.001. View

Guilak F, Cohen D, Estes B, Gimble J, Liedtke W, Chen C . Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell. 2009; 5(1):17-26. PMC: 2768283. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.016. View

Geiger B, Spatz J, Bershadsky A . Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009; 10(1):21-33. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2593. View

Engler A, Sen S, Sweeney H, Discher D . Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006; 126(4):677-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044. View

Chen C, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides G, Ingber D . Micropatterned surfaces for control of cell shape, position, and function. Biotechnol Prog. 1998; 14(3):356-63. DOI: 10.1021/bp980031m. View

Nikkhah M, Eshak N, Zorlutuna P, Annabi N, Castello M, Kim K . Directed endothelial cell morphogenesis in micropatterned gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2012; 33(35):9009-18. PMC: 3643201. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.08.068. View

10.

Saha K, Keung A, Irwin E, Li Y, Little L, Schaffer D . Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. Biophys J. 2008; 95(9):4426-38. PMC: 2567955. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.108.132217. View

11.

Chrobak K, Potter D, Tien J . Formation of perfused, functional microvascular tubes in vitro. Microvasc Res. 2006; 71(3):185-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2006.02.005. View

12.

Mih J, Marinkovic A, Liu F, Sharif A, Tschumperlin D . Matrix stiffness reverses the effect of actomyosin tension on cell proliferation. J Cell Sci. 2012; 125(Pt 24):5974-83. PMC: 3585515. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.108886. View

13.

Yuan Z, Nie H, Wang S, Lee C, Li A, Fu S . Biomaterial selection for tooth regeneration. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2011; 17(5):373-88. PMC: 3179624. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2011.0041. View

14.

Rajnicek A, McCaig C . Guidance of CNS growth cones by substratum grooves and ridges: effects of inhibitors of the cytoskeleton, calcium channels and signal transduction pathways. J Cell Sci. 1998; 110 ( Pt 23):2915-24. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.110.23.2915. View

15.

Yamaguchi M, Ikeda K, Suzuki M, Kiyohara A, Kudoh S, Shimizu K . Cell patterning using a template of microstructured organosilane layer fabricated by vacuum ultraviolet light lithography. Langmuir. 2011; 27(20):12521-32. DOI: 10.1021/la202904g. View

16.

Discher D, Janmey P, Wang Y . Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science. 2005; 310(5751):1139-43. DOI: 10.1126/science.1116995. View

17.

Khademhosseini A, Langer R, Borenstein J, Vacanti J . Microscale technologies for tissue engineering and biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(8):2480-7. PMC: 1413775. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507681102. View

18.

He L, Zhong J, Gong Q, Cheng B, Kim S, Ling J . Regenerative Endodontics by Cell Homing. Dent Clin North Am. 2016; 61(1):143-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2016.08.010. View

19.

Yousaf M, Houseman B, Mrksich M . Using electroactive substrates to pattern the attachment of two different cell populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(11):5992-6. PMC: 33411. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.101112898. View

20.

Okano T, Yamada N, OKUHARA M, Sakai H, Sakurai Y . Mechanism of cell detachment from temperature-modulated, hydrophilic-hydrophobic polymer surfaces. Biomaterials. 1995; 16(4):297-303. DOI: 10.1016/0142-9612(95)93257-e. View