» Articles » PMID: 31776698

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Improves Oncologic Outcomes in Low and Mid Clinical T3N0 Rectal Cancers

Overview
Date 2019 Nov 29
PMID 31776698
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Controversial data exists in the current literature in regard to the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) in patients with clinical T3N0 (cT3N0) rectal cancers, specifically based on location and relation to peritoneal reflection. We aimed to analyze the impact of nCRT on oncologic outcomes among cT3N0 rectal cancers, depending on the tumor height from anal verge (AV).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with cT3N0 rectal cancers was included from a query of a prospectively maintained rectal cancer database from 1980 to 2016. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the tumor height: low (1-5 cm from AV), mid (6-10 cm from AV), and upper (11-15 cm from AV). Patients were stratified by use of nCRT.

Main Outcomes: 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and local recurrence (LR) using Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results: Five hundred ninety-two patients were included. Overall, 364 (61.4%) patients received nCRT and 228 (38.6%) patients did not. There were 251 (43%) patients with low, 302 (51%) with mid, and 39 (7%) with upper rectal cancer. Patients with low and mid rectal cancers received nCRT more frequently than those with upper rectal cancers (68.5% and 61.2% vs 43.6%, p = 0.007). The 5-year OS was 78% and 63%, DFS-88% and 73%, LR-1% and 8% in nCRT followed by resection vs. surgery alone (p < 0.001). In regard to cancer location after nCRT compared with surgery alone, low and mid cancers had better OS, DFS, and CSS, compared with upper ones.

Conclusion: nCRT prolongs survival among patients with rectal cancer below 10 cm from AV; however, it has no effect on 5-year oncologic survival of patients with upper rectal cancer located below peritoneal reflection.

Citing Articles

Survival comparison of stage IIA rectal cancer with or without neoadjuvant therapy: a SEER database analysis with propensity score matching.

Yan H, Wang P, Wu Y, Liu Y J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022; 13(5):2293-2305.

PMID: 36388673 PMC: 9660043. DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-166.


Effect of understaging on local recurrence of rectal cancer.

Giesen L, Borstlap W, Bemelman W, Tanis P, Verhoef C, Olthof P J Surg Oncol. 2020; 122(6):1179-1186.

PMID: 32654177 PMC: 7689834. DOI: 10.1002/jso.26111.

References
1.
Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R . Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(17):1731-40. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694. View

2.
Khan M, Ang C, Hakeem A, Scott N, Saunders R, Botterill I . The Impact of Tumour Distance From the Anal Verge on Clinical Management and Outcomes in Patients Having a Curative Resection for Rectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017; 21(12):2056-2065. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3581-0. View

3.
Hwang M, Park J, Kim D, Chang H, Hong Y, Kim S . Prognostic impact of peritonealisation in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy: extraperitoneal versus intraperitoneal rectal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2009; 94(3):353-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.11.005. View

4.
Peng L, Milsom J, Garrett K, Nandakumar G, Coplowitz S, Parashar B . Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-based analysis of the impact of preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy on survival outcomes for T3N0 rectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2014; 38(1):73-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2013.12.008. View

5.
Bergquist J, Thiels C, Shubert C, Habermann E, Hayman A, Zielinski M . Is Chemotherapy or Radiation Therapy in Addition to Surgery Beneficial for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the Elderly? A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Study. World J Surg. 2015; 40(2):447-55. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-015-3319-7. View