» Articles » PMID: 31775309

Er:YAG Laser Irradiation Reduces Microbial Viability When Used in Combination with Irrigation with Sodium Hypochlorite, Chlorhexidine, and Hydrogen Peroxide

Overview
Journal Microorganisms
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2019 Nov 29
PMID 31775309
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser is used to treat periodontal disease; however, its effectiveness at killing oral bacteria is not well known. Furthermore, the compounding effect of the combination of a laser treatment and irrigation methods with antimicrobials on bacterial viability is yet to be determined. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the Er:YAG laser with irrigation using chlorhexidine (CHX), hydrogen peroxide (HO), or sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) on the viability of oral bacteria. Three bacterial species were used in our study: , , and . Bacteria were grown in an anaerobic chamber in brain heart infusion broth and incubated at 37 °C. Bacterial samples with an OD of 0.5 were irradiated with the Er:YAG laser at 2940 nm using a 400-µm Varian tip. The experiment was repeated four times using these parameters: 40 mJ, 40 Hz, and 1.6 W for 20 seconds with the 300 µs short pulse duration in contact mode. Treatment groups consisted of the following: (1) no treatment, (2) 0.5% HO alone, (3) 0.5% NaOCl alone, (4) 0.03% CHX alone, (5) Er:YAG irradiation alone, (6) Er:YAG irradiation with 0.5% HO, (7) Er:YAG irradiation with 0.5% NaOCl, and (8) Er:YAG irradiation with 0.03% CHX. Microbial viability was determined through plating and colony counts and calculated into CFU/ml. Statistical analysis was done using a two-tailed paired t-test. The use of the Er:YAG laser alone failed to show statistically significant antibacterial activity against any of bacteria. The most effective mono-treatment with irrigation solutions for all three bacteria were 0.5% HO and 0.5% NaOCl ( < 0.001 for each solution). Irrigation with 0.03% CHX was most effective against ( < 0.01) and less against and and showed the least antibacterial action alone but improved significantly in combination therapy ( < 0.05). The combined treatment with the Er:YAG showed the greatest and most significant improvement in the reduction of bacterial viability compared to any other treatment group ( < 0.05 for each combined treatment). Irradiation with the Er:YAG laser with the addition of 0.5% HO, 0.5% NaOCl, or 0.03% CHX under a short working time (20 s) resulted in a significant reduction of bacterial viability for all three bacterial species compared with any single treatment option. The combination of irradiation with the Er:YAG laser with the addition of 0.5% HO, 0.5% NaOCl, or 0.03% CHX resulted in a larger reduction of bacterial survival when compared to monotherapies with antimicrobial solutions or laser. The combination of the Er:YAG laser with a low concentration irrigant solution of 0.5% HO, 0.5% NaOCl, or 0.03% CHX could be an effective treatment protocol for the reduction of periodontal pathogens and thus suitable treatment for non-surgical periodontal therapy.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the Disinfection Efficacy of Er: YAG Laser Light on Single-Species Candida Biofilms-An In Vitro Study.

Dembicka-Maczka D, Kepa M, Fiegler-Rudol J, Grzech-Lesniak Z, Matys J, Grzech-Lesniak K Dent J (Basel). 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39996962 PMC: 11853755. DOI: 10.3390/dj13020088.


Effect of Nd:YAG Laser Irradiation on the Growth of Oral Biofilm.

Grzech-Lesniak Z, Szwach J, Lelonkiewicz M, Migas K, Pyrkosz J, Szwajkowski M Microorganisms. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39597620 PMC: 11596257. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12112231.


What can we learn from treatments of oral lichen planus?.

Wu T, Bai Y, Jing Y, Chen F Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024; 14:1279220.

PMID: 38426013 PMC: 10902003. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1279220.


The In Vitro Effect of Laser Irradiation (Er:YAG and CO) and Chemical Reagents (Hydrogen Peroxide, Sodium Hypochlorite, Chlorhexidine, or Sodium Fluoride) Alone or in Combination on Reducing Root Caries Bacteria.

Reddy N, Deeb J, Kitten T, Carrico C, Grzech-Lesniak K Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(24).

PMID: 36555374 PMC: 9779214. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232415732.


Effectiveness of lasers and aPDT in elimination of intraoral halitosis: a systematic review based on clinical trials.

Wozniak A, Matys J, Grzech-Lesniak K Lasers Med Sci. 2022; 37(9):3403-3411.

PMID: 36422753 PMC: 9686215. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-022-03656-3.


References
1.
Gaspirc B, Skaleric U . Clinical evaluation of periodontal surgical treatment with an Er:YAG laser: 5-year results. J Periodontol. 2007; 78(10):1864-71. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.070054. View

2.
RAMFJORD S, Caffesse R, Morrison E, Hill R, Kerry G, Appleberry E . Four modalities of periodontal treatment compared over five years. J Periodontal Res. 1987; 22(3):222-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1987.tb01573.x. View

3.
Grzech-Lesniak K, Matys J, Dominiak M . Comparison of the clinical and microbiological effects of antibiotic therapy in periodontal pockets following laser treatment: An in vivo study. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018; 27(9):1263-1270. DOI: 10.17219/acem/70413. View

4.
Kalkwarf K, Tussing G, Davis M . Histologic evaluation of gingival curettage facilitated by sodium hypochlorite solution. J Periodontol. 1982; 53(2):63-70. DOI: 10.1902/jop.1982.53.2.63. View

5.
Maeda K, Nagata H, Yamamoto Y, Tanaka M, Tanaka J, Minamino N . Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase of Streptococcus oralis functions as a coadhesin for Porphyromonas gingivalis major fimbriae. Infect Immun. 2004; 72(3):1341-8. PMC: 355992. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.3.1341-1348.2004. View