» Articles » PMID: 3177438

Fragile X Syndrome: Growth, Development, and Intellectual Function

Overview
Journal Am J Med Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 1988 May 1
PMID 3177438
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We collected data on growth, psychomotor development, speech and language development, and intellectual function on a cohort of 100 males with the fragile X chromosome and 95 carrier females. The data include information on prenatal growth (33 males), growth during the preadult years (32 males), psychomotor development during the first 2 years (25 males), speech and language development (15 males and 5 females), and intellectual function (93 males, 33 females, and 10 obligate carriers who were cytogenetically normal). Birth measurements appeared normal when plotted on the Usher/McLean curves of newborn infants (mean head circumference - OFC - at 40th centile, length at 60th centile and weight at 55th centile). Following birth, OFC rose above the 50th percentile and continued above average throughout the preadult years, whereas average length was above average for the first 5 years only and weight did not deviate from the normal mean. Psychomotor development lagged behind the norm from birth with affected males requiring nearly twice as long as expected to sit alone, walk unassisted, and say first words clearly. All males and females studied had significant language delay; all except one male had abnormalities of articulation. All on whom a clear voice sample was obtained had low voice pitch, and 80% had a hoarse or harsh quality of voice. Five males had word repetitions or perseverative speech during the preadult years. The mean IQ of the 93 males studied was 33 and regression analysis demonstrated a decrease in intellectual performance with age. Four fifths of the female carriers who expressed the fra(X) had intellectual performance in the mentally retarded range and showed similar decrease in performance with age. Obligate female carriers who did not express the fra(X) site had normal IQs (IQ 102 +/- 13.3).

Citing Articles

Characterizing the Richness of Maternal Input for Word Learning in Neurogenetic Disorders.

Mattie L, Hadley P Semin Speech Lang. 2021; 42(4):301-317.

PMID: 34311482 PMC: 9210920. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1730914.


Parents' initial concerns about the development of their children later diagnosed with fragile X syndrome.

Zhang D, Kaufmann W, Sigafoos J, Bartl-Pokorny K, Krieber M, Marschik P J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2018; 42(2):114-122.

PMID: 29875616 PMC: 5985965. DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2016.1228858.


Fragile X syndrome: A review of clinical management.

Lozano R, Azarang A, Wilaisakditipakorn T, Hagerman R Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2016; 5(3):145-57.

PMID: 27672537 PMC: 4995426. DOI: 10.5582/irdr.2016.01048.


Development of socio-communicative skills in 9- to 12-month-old individuals with fragile X syndrome.

Marschik P, Bartl-Pokorny K, Sigafoos J, Urlesberger L, Pokorny F, Didden R Res Dev Disabil. 2014; 35(3):597-602.

PMID: 24480609 PMC: 5951280. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.004.


Perseveration in the connected speech of boys with Fragile X syndrome with and without autism spectrum disorder.

Martin G, Roberts J, Helm-Estabrooks N, Sideris J, Vanderbilt J, Moskowitz L Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012; 117(5):384-99.

PMID: 22998486 PMC: 3494464. DOI: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.5.384.