The Ethics of Facial Allotransplantation: A Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open

Specialty General Surgery

Date 2019 Nov 28

PMID 31772878

Citations 3

Authors

Xiangxia Liu

Sarah Langsdon

Wesley Holloway

Shuqia Xu

Qing Tang

Yangbin Xu

Sai Ram Velamuri

William Hickerson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Currently, there are more than 40 cases of facial allotransplantation performed by 13 different groups in 10 countries. Although it has become a potential option to reconstruct and restore the function and appearance of severely facially disfigured individuals, the ethical concerns of facial allotransplantation remain unsolved. We conducted a systematic review to better understand the ethical concerns on facial allotransplantation and the changing trends of the ethical debate over time.

Methods: A systematic review of 3 databases was performed to identify articles related to ethical topics on facial allotransplantation. The inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed articles written since 1995 on the topics of ethics and facial allotransplantation in English, French, and Chinese languages. The ethical concerns extracted from the included articles were categorized into 4 core principles of ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. The different themes under these 4 principles were extracted and subgrouped. The positions of the included articles were collected. Joinpoint regression was applied to compare the frequency of themes and positions by publication year. We presented the main topics on ethical concerns and the changing trends in ethical themes and principles of facial allotransplantation.

Results: There were 889 articles identified initially. After excluding 265 duplicated articles, 624 articles were included for title/abstract review process, and 148 articles were included in final data analysis. The publication year was from 2002 to 2018 with 136 articles in English, 11 in French, and 1 in Chinese. The most addressed principle was nonmaleficence (117/148, 79.1%), followed by beneficence (116/148, 78.4%), justice (103/148, 69.6%), and autonomy (86/148, 58.1%). The themes on immunosuppression/rejection, quality of life, and identity were the top 3 addressed ethical concerns. Twelve of 13 most addressed ethical themes demonstrated a decreasing trend after 2004. The themes of identity under beneficence showed a significant decrease after 2004. Ethical concerns on the cost/financial topic were the only one showing consistently increase trends from 2002 to 2018. There was a significant increase of the papers in favor of facial allotransplantation procedure comparing to those were against or neutral before and after 2008.

Conclusions: More and more articles support facial allotransplantation as a feasible option to reconstruct and restore the function and appearance of severely facially disfigured individuals. The requirement of life-long immunosuppression therapy, quality of life, and identity center the ethical debates. Supported by favorable short-term results, 12 of 13 most addressed ethical concerns have trended down. The theme of cost/financial topic becomes more frequently addressed in recent years.

Citing Articles

Are face transplant candidates choosing autonomously? A preliminary method to evaluate autonomous choosing in psychosocial and bioethical assessments.

Farias-Yapur A Front Transplant. 2024; 3:1346667.

PMID: 38993750 PMC: 11235316. DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1346667.

Trends, Gaps, and Collaboration in Facial Transplantation: A Bibliometric Study.

Hoffman A, Colon R, Diep G, Berman Z, Kimberly L, Trilles J Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023; 10(4):e4248.

PMID: 37073383 PMC: 10106208. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004248.

Facial Transplantation: Complications, Outcomes, and Long-Term Management Strategies.

Shokri T, Saadi R, Wang W, Reddy L, Ducic Y Semin Plast Surg. 2020; 34(4):245-253.

PMID: 33380909 PMC: 7759434. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1721760.

References

Petrini C . Facial transplants: current situation and ethical issues. Clin Ter. 2015; 166(5):215-7. DOI: 10.7417/CT.2015.1881. View

Park E, Genden E . Facial transplantation: the next frontier in head and neck reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2009; 17(2):271-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsc.2009.01.007. View

Coffman K, Siemionow M . Ethics of facial transplantation revisited. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2014; 19(2):181-7. DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000058. View

Giatsidis G, Sinha I, Pomahac B . Reflections on a Decade of Face Transplantation. Ann Surg. 2016; 265(4):841-846. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001760. View

Edgar A . The challenge of transplants to an intersubjectively established sense of personal identity. Health Care Anal. 2009; 17(2):123-33. DOI: 10.1007/s10728-009-0119-y. View

Pirnay P, Herve C, Meningaud J . [Have we answered all the ethical issues concerning composite tissue allotransplantation of the face?]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 2013; 114(2):53-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.revsto.2013.01.003. View

Lindford A, Makisalo H, Jalanko H, Lauronen J, Anttila V, Juteau S . The Helsinki approach to face transplantation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018; 72(2):173-180. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.08.030. View

Gilman S . Facial Transplants: What are Authentic Faces?. Acta Hist Leopoldina. 2018; (65):171-182. View

Morreim E . About face: downplaying the role of the press in facial transplantation research. Am J Bioeth. 2005; 4(3):27-9. DOI: 10.1080/15265160490496697. View

10.

Peled Z, Pribaz J . Face transplantation: the view from Harvard Medical School. South Med J. 2006; 99(4):414-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.smj.0000208480.00493.d7. View

11.

Wiggins O, Barker J, Martinez S, Vossen M, Maldonado C, Grossi F . On the ethics of facial transplantation research. Am J Bioeth. 2005; 4(3):1-12. DOI: 10.1080/15265160490496507. View

12.

Benghiac A, Garrett J, Carter B . Ethical issues in pediatric face transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2017; 21(7). DOI: 10.1111/petr.13032. View

13.

Furr L, Wiggins O, Cunningham M, Vasilic D, Brown C, Banis Jr J . Psychosocial implications of disfigurement and the future of human face transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120(2):559-565. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000267584.66732.e5. View

14.

Pearl S . Saving faces. CMAJ. 2019; 190(16):E511-E512. PMC: 5915250. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.180039. View

15.

Barker J, Furr A, McGuire S, Cunningham M, Wiggins O, Banis Jr J . On the ethics of composite tissue allotransplantation (facial transplantation). Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119(5):1621-1622. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000256501.91655.2e. View

16.

Freeman M, Abou Jaoude P . Justifying surgery's last taboo: the ethics of face transplants. J Med Ethics. 2007; 33(2):76-81. PMC: 2598231. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2006.016865. View

17.

Thorburn G, Hettiaratchy S, Ashcroft R, Butler P . Patient selection for facial transplantation III: Ethical considerations. Int J Surg. 2007; 2(2):118-9. DOI: 10.1016/S1743-9191(06)60062-9. View

18.

Alam D, Papay F, Djohan R, Bernard S, Lohman R, Gordon C . The technical and anatomical aspects of the World's first near-total human face and maxilla transplant. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009; 11(6):369-77. DOI: 10.1001/archfacial.2009.80. View

19.

. The French position: Comité Consultatif National d'Ethique pour les sciences de la vie et de la santé: "Composite tissue allograftransplantation of the face (total or partial graft)". South Med J. 2006; 99(4):432-3. View

20.

Petit F, Paraskevas A, Lantieri L . A surgeons' perspective on the ethics of face transplantation. Am J Bioeth. 2005; 4(3):14-6. DOI: 10.1080/15265160490496868. View