» Articles » PMID: 31769761

Effect of Brief Biofeedback Via a Smartphone App on Stress Recovery: Randomized Experimental Study

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2019 Nov 27
PMID 31769761
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Smartphones are often vilified for negatively influencing well-being and contributing to stress. However, these devices may, in fact, be useful in times of stress and, in particular, aid in stress recovery. Mobile apps that deliver evidence-based techniques for stress reduction, such as heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) training, hold promise as convenient, accessible, and effective stress-reducing tools. Numerous mobile health apps that may potentially aid in stress recovery are available, but very few have demonstrated that they can influence health-related physiological stress parameters (eg, salivary biomarkers of stress). The ability to recover swiftly from stress and reduce physiological arousal is particularly important for long-term health, and thus, it is imperative that evidence is provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of stress-reducing mobile health apps in this context.

Objective: The purpose of this research was to investigate the physiological and psychological effects of using a smartphone app for HRVB training following a stressful experience. The efficacy of the gamified Breather component of the Happify mobile health app was examined in an experimental setting.

Methods: In this study, participants (N=140) underwent a laboratory stressor and were randomly assigned to recover in one of three ways: with no phone present, with a phone present, with the HRBV game. Those in the no phone condition had no access to their phone. Those in the phone present condition had their phone but did not use it. Those in the HRVB game condition used the serious game Breather on the Happify app. Stress recovery was assessed via repeated measures of salivary alpha amylase, cortisol, and self-reported acute stress (on a 1-100 scale).

Results: Participants in the HRVB game condition had significantly lower levels of salivary alpha amylase during recovery than participants in the other conditions (F=3.78, P=.03). There were no significant differences among the conditions during recovery for salivary cortisol levels or self-reported stress.

Conclusions: These results show that engaging in a brief HRVB training session on a smartphone reduces levels of salivary alpha amylase following a stressful experience, providing preliminary evidence for the effectiveness of Breather in improving physiological stress recovery. Given the known ties between stress recovery and future well-being, this study provides a possible mechanism by which gamified biofeedback apps may lead to better health.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Coping and Resilience of Frontline Mental Healthcare Professionals Towards Workplace Violence on Psychiatric Wards-A Systematic Review.

Doedens P, Kiel-Clayton L, Daams J, de Haan L Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025; 34(1):e70016.

PMID: 39994945 PMC: 11850961. DOI: 10.1111/inm.70016.


Depression Self-Care Apps' Characteristics and Applicability to Older Adults: Systematic Assessment.

Yin R, Rajappan D, Martinengo L, Chan F, Smith H, Griva K J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e56418.

PMID: 39983112 PMC: 11890144. DOI: 10.2196/56418.


Smartphone-based serious games for mental health: a scoping review.

Gomez-Cambronero A, Mann A, Mira A, Doherty G, Casteleyn S Multimed Tools Appl. 2024; 83(36):84047-84094.

PMID: 39553422 PMC: 11564251. DOI: 10.1007/s11042-024-18971-w.


Effects of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Training on Anxiety Reduction and Brain Activity: a Randomized Active-Controlled Study Using EEG.

Saito R, Yoshida K, Sawamura D, Watanabe A, Tokikuni Y, Sakai S Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2024; 49(4):603-617.

PMID: 38888656 DOI: 10.1007/s10484-024-09650-5.


The effect of a single-session heart rate variability biofeedback on attentional control: does stress matter?.

Blaser B, Weymar M, Wendt J Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1292983.

PMID: 38034309 PMC: 10687403. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1292983.


References
1.
McEwen B, Gianaros P . Stress- and allostasis-induced brain plasticity. Annu Rev Med. 2010; 62:431-45. PMC: 4251716. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-052209-100430. View

2.
Lesage F, Berjot S, Deschamps F . Clinical stress assessment using a visual analogue scale. Occup Med (Lond). 2012; 62(8):600-5. DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqs140. View

3.
Fiordelli M, Diviani N, Schulz P . Mapping mHealth research: a decade of evolution. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(5):e95. PMC: 3668610. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2430. View

4.
Gerin W, Davidson K, Christenfeld N, Goyal T, Schwartz J . The role of angry rumination and distraction in blood pressure recovery from emotional arousal. Psychosom Med. 2006; 68(1):64-72. DOI: 10.1097/01.psy.0000195747.12404.aa. View

5.
Master S, Eisenberger N, Taylor S, Naliboff B, Shirinyan D, Lieberman M . A picture's worth: partner photographs reduce experimentally induced pain. Psychol Sci. 2009; 20(11):1316-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02444.x. View