» Articles » PMID: 31767409

Long-Term Survival After Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Pathologically Proven Renal Cell Carcinoma in 100 Patients

Overview
Date 2019 Nov 27
PMID 31767409
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine the long-term survival of patients treated with percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation for pathologically proven renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Materials And Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, 100 patients with 125 RCCs (100 clear-cell, 19 papillary, and 6 chromophobe) 0.8-8 cm in size treated with RF ablation were evaluated at a single large tertiary-care center between 2004 and 2015. Technical success, primary and secondary technique efficacy, and pre- and postprocedural estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3-6 months and 2-3 years were recorded. Overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and local tumor progression-free survival were calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Complications were classified per the Clavien-Dindo system. Statistical testing was done via χ tests for proportions and paired t test for changes in eGFR. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.

Results: Overall technical success rate was 100%, and primary and secondary technique efficacy rates were 90% and 100%, respectively. Median follow-up was 62.8 months, ranging from 1 to 120 months. The 10-year overall, cancer-specific, and local progression-free survival rates were 32%, 86%, and 92%, respectively. The number of ablation probes used was predictive of residual unablated tumor (P < .001). There were no significant changes in preprocedure vs 2-3-years postprocedure eGFR (65.2 vs 62.1 mL/min/1.73 m; P = .443). There was a 9% overall incidence of complications, the majority of which were grade I.

Conclusions: Image-guided percutaneous RF ablation of RCCs is effective at achieving local control and preventing cancer-specific death within 10 years from initial treatment.

Citing Articles

Percutaneous Cryotherapy and Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Masses: Multicenter Comparative Analysis with Minimum 3-Year Follow-up.

Carbonara U, Ditonno F, Beksac A, Derweesh I, Cerrato C, Celia A Int Braz J Urol. 2025; 51(2).

PMID: 39913094 PMC: 11884627. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0565.


Pulsed electric field ablation as a candidate to enhance the anti-tumor immune response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Arciga B, Walters D, Kimchi E, Staveley-OCarroll K, Li G, Teixeiro E Cancer Lett. 2024; 609:217361.

PMID: 39608443 PMC: 11625606. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.217361.


Factors that Affect Outcome of Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Masses.

Zinko G, Hrebenyuk M, Kjellman A, Forslin Y, Delle M Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(9):5318-5329.

PMID: 39330020 PMC: 11431956. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31090392.


Complications after Nephron-sparing Interventions for Renal Tumors: Imaging Findings and Management.

Chaurasia A, Singh S, Homayounieh F, Gopal N, Jones E, Linehan W Radiographics. 2023; 43(7):e220196.

PMID: 37384546 PMC: 10323228. DOI: 10.1148/rg.220196.


Risk Factors for Renal Function Impairment Following Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Tumors.

Park I, Yoon S, Kim D Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2022; 83(2):317-330.

PMID: 36237917 PMC: 9514441. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0076.