» Articles » PMID: 31766746

The Effectiveness of Dog Population Management: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2019 Nov 27
PMID 31766746
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The worldwide population of domestic dogs is estimated at approximately 700 million, with around 75% classified as "free-roaming". Where free-roaming dogs exist in high densities, there are significant implications for public health, animal welfare, and wildlife. Approaches to manage dog populations include culling, fertility control, and sheltering. Understanding the effectiveness of each of these interventions is important in guiding future dog population management. We present the results of a systematic review of published studies investigating dog population management, to assess: (1) where and when studies were carried out; (2) what population management methods were used; and (3) what was the effect of the method. We evaluated the reporting quality of the published studies for strength of evidence assessment. The systematic review resulted in a corpus of 39 papers from 15 countries, reporting a wide disparity of approaches and measures of effect. We synthesised the management methods and reported effects. Fertility control was most investigated and had the greatest reported effect on dog population size. Reporting quality was low for power calculations (11%), sample size calculations (11%), and the use of control populations (17%). We provide recommendations for future studies to use common metrics and improve reporting quality, study design, and modelling approaches in order to allow better assessment of the true impact of dog population management.

Citing Articles

Socio-economic assessment of dog population management systems: a scoping review.

Ghimire R, Mohanty P, Hiby E, Larkins A, Durr S, Hartnack S Front Vet Sci. 2025; 12:1519913.

PMID: 39902170 PMC: 11789200. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1519913.


Does perioperative electroacupuncture reduce postoperative pain in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy?.

Iwe C, Schiele A, Passenegg V, Corona D, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R, Heitzmann V Front Vet Sci. 2025; 11():1513853.

PMID: 39840340 PMC: 11747123. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1513853.


Rabies in rural northeast India: A case report emphasising the urgency of the One Health approach.

Mohanty P, Boro P, Heydtmann S, Durr S, Tiwari H One Health. 2025; 19():100850.

PMID: 39802066 PMC: 11723194. DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100850.


Conceptual Framework for Community-Based Prevention of Brown Dog Tick-Associated Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever.

Brophy M, Weis E, Drexler N, Paddock C, Nicholson W, Kersh G Emerg Infect Dis. 2024; 30(11):2231-2240.

PMID: 39447135 PMC: 11521193. DOI: 10.3201/eid3011.240293.


Socio-economic evaluation of human-dog coexistence: A 40,000 years history.

Fallahi M, Masoudi A, Vaez Torshizi R, Maghsoudi A Vet Med Sci. 2024; 10(6):e70012.

PMID: 39385665 PMC: 11464907. DOI: 10.1002/vms3.70012.


References
1.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(4):264-9, W64. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. View

2.
Dalla Villa P, Kahn S, Stuardo L, Iannetti L, Nardo A, Serpell J . Free-roaming dog control among OIE-member countries. Prev Vet Med. 2010; 97(1):58-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.07.001. View

3.
Baquero O, Marconcin S, Rocha A, Garcia R . Companion animal demography and population management in Pinhais, Brazil. Prev Vet Med. 2018; 158:169-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.07.006. View

4.
Rautenbach G, Boomker J, De Villiers I . A descriptive study of the canine population in a rural town in southern Africa. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1991; 62(4):158-62. View

5.
Morris K, Wolf J, Gies D . Trends in intake and outcome data for animal shelters in Colorado, 2000 to 2007. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2011; 238(3):329-36. DOI: 10.2460/javma.238.3.329. View