» Articles » PMID: 31764992

The Association of Nodal Upstaging with Surgical Approach and Its Impact on Long-term Survival After Resection of Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Proponents of open thoracotomy (OPEN) and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) claim its oncological superiority over video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) in terms of the accuracy of lymph node staging.

Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing lobectomy without neoadjuvant therapy from 2010 to 2014. Nodal upstaging rates were compared using a surgical approach. Overall survival adjusted for confounding variables was examined using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results: A total of 64 676 patients fulfilled the selection criteria. The number of patients who underwent lobectomy by RATS, VATS and OPEN approaches was 5470 (8.5%), 17 545 (27.1%) and 41 661 (64.4%), respectively. The mean number of lymph nodes examined for each of these approaches was 10.9, 11.3 and 10 (P < 0.01) and upstaging rates were 11.2%, 11.7% and 12.6% (P < 0.01), respectively. For patients with clinical stage I disease (N = 46 826; RATS = 4338, VATS = 13 416 and OPEN = 29 072), the mean lymph nodes examined were 10.6, 10.8 and 9.4 (P < 0.01), and upstaging rates were 10.8%, 11.1% and 12.1% (P < 0.01), respectively. A multivariable analysis suggested an association with improved survival with RATS and VATS compared with OPEN surgery [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.89 and 0.89, respectively; P < 0.01] for patients with all stages. In stage I disease, VATS but not RATS was associated with increased overall survival compared with the OPEN approach (HR = 0.81; P < 0.01).

Conclusions: RATS lobectomy is not superior to VATS lobectomy with respect to lymph node yield or upstaging of NSCLC. Increased nodal upstaging by the OPEN approach does not confer a survival advantage in any stage of NSCLC and may be associated with decreased overall survival.

Citing Articles

Propensity score matched comparison of lymph node upstaging in early-stage lung cancer: open versus minimally invasive surgery with standardized lymphadenectomy.

Zimmermann J, Walter J, Pfeiffer V, Kovacs J, Yavuz G, Schon J J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025; 20(1):96.

PMID: 39865313 PMC: 11770911. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-025-03346-5.


Long-term outcomes of robotic versus video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reconstructed patient data.

Tasoudis P, Diehl J, Merlo A, Long J J Thorac Dis. 2023; 15(10):5700-5713.

PMID: 37969301 PMC: 10636447. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-582.


Minimally Invasive Surgery in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Where Do We Stand?.

Berzenji L, Wen W, Verleden S, Claes E, Yogeswaran S, Lauwers P Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(17).

PMID: 37686557 PMC: 10487098. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174281.


Beyond the Frontline: A Triple-Line Approach of Thoracic Surgeons in Lung Cancer Management-State of the Art.

Bottet B, Piton N, Selim J, Sarsam M, Guisier F, Baste J Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(16).

PMID: 37627067 PMC: 10452134. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164039.


Comment on "The Unbearable Lightness of Difference Between Statistical and Clinical Significance".

Cao Y, Jin R, Li H Ann Surg Open. 2023; 3(1):e147.

PMID: 37600091 PMC: 10431444. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000147.


References
1.
Heineman D, Daniels J, Schreurs W . Clinical staging of NSCLC: current evidence and implications for adjuvant chemotherapy. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2017; 9(9):599-609. PMC: 5564882. DOI: 10.1177/1758834017722746. View

2.
Lee P, Kamel M, Nasar A, Ghaly G, Port J, Paul S . Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Effects of Cumulative Institutional Experience on Adequacy of Lymphadenectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 101(3):1116-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.073. View

3.
Wen Y, Xi K, Xi K, Zhang R, Wang G, Huang Z . The number of resected lymph nodes is associated with the long-term survival outcome in patients with T2 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2018; 10:6869-6877. PMC: 6296683. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S186047. View

4.
Scott W, Allen M, Darling G, Meyers B, Decker P, Putnam J . Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 139(4):976-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.059. View

5.
Merritt R, Hoang C, Shrager J . Lymph node evaluation achieved by open lobectomy compared with thoracoscopic lobectomy for N0 lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 96(4):1171-1177. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.044. View