» Articles » PMID: 31758479

Concentration of Phthalate Esters in Indoor and Outdoor Dust in Kocaeli, Turkey: Implications for Human Exposure and Risk

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Nov 24
PMID 31758479
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The interest in phthalate esters (PAEs) has increased in recent years because elevated phthalate levels have been detected in environmental matrices and they have certain adverse effects on human health. Indoor dust from 90 homes and outdoor (street) dust from outside these homes were collected in Kocaeli province between February and April 2016 and analyzed for eight PAEs. The total indoor dust concentrations of eight PAEs (ΣPAEs) ranged from 21.33 μg g to 1802 μg g (median, 387.67 μg g), significantly higher than outdoor dust concentrations (0.16-36.85 μg g with median 4.84 μg g). Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) was the most dominant pollutant in both indoor and outdoor environments with a median value of 316.02 μg g and 3.89 μg g, respectively, followed by di-n-butyl phthalate and butylbenzyl phthalate (BBP). DEHP was measured within the range of 198.54-816.92 μg g and BBP within the range of 15.52-495.33 μg g in homes with PVC coating, significantly higher than the levels in homes with parquet and tiled floor (p<0.05). Monte Carlo simulation was applied to probabilistically estimate exposure to PAEs and associated carcinogenic risk. The ΣPAE median values of non-dietary ingestion and dermal absorption exposure were estimated as 1.57 μg kg day and 0.007 μg kg day for children and 0.09 μg kg day and 0.04 μg kg day for adults while inhalation route exposure to PAE in dust was at a negligible level for both groups. Children were more exposed to PAEs through ingestion route (92.74% to 99.54% of the total exposure) while adult exposure through ingestion routes (62-68.4%) and dermal absorption (29.74% and 31.87% of the total exposure) were comparable. The mean cancer risk level via non-dietary ingestion of DEHP for children was 2.33×10, about eight times higher than the levels for adults. The risk levels of about 16% of adults and 95% of children are greater than the threshold value of 10 when the population is exposed to DEHP in indoor dust. Looking from the viewpoint of child health, the most effective method to reduce exposure among the measured PAEs is to keep the release of DEHP under control, especially in indoor environment, and to take precautions to reduce exposure.

Citing Articles

[Analysis of phthalate esters and their novel alternatives in indoor dust using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-time of flight mass spectrometry].

Wang L, Gao K, Li J, Peng J, Yang Z, Ya E Se Pu. 2025; 43(2):185-196.

PMID: 39844709 PMC: 11755752. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2023.12002.


Mono-n-hexyl phthalate: exposure estimation and assessment of health risks based on levels found in human urine samples.

Pirow R, Bernauer U, Blume A, Cieszynski A, Flingelli G, Heiland A Arch Toxicol. 2024; 98(11):3659-3671.

PMID: 39153032 PMC: 11489165. DOI: 10.1007/s00204-024-03835-x.


Phthalate Acid Esters (PAEs) in Indoor Dust from Decoration Material Stores: Occurrence, Sources, and Health Risks.

Chen L, Gao C, Zhang Y, Shen H, Lu X, Huang C Toxics. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39058157 PMC: 11280923. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12070505.


Levels and health risk assessments of Phthalate acid esters in indoor dust of some microenvironments within Ikeja and Ota, Nigeria.

Anake W, Nnamani E Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):11209.

PMID: 37433814 PMC: 10336085. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-38062-4.


The effects of inhaled pollutants on reproduction in marginalized communities: a contemporary review.

Santacruz-Marquez R, Neff A, Mourikes V, Fletcher E, Flaws J Inhal Toxicol. 2023; 36(5):286-303.

PMID: 37075037 PMC: 10584991. DOI: 10.1080/08958378.2023.2197941.


References
1.
Guo Y, Kannan K . Comparative assessment of human exposure to phthalate esters from house dust in China and the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2011; 45(8):3788-94. DOI: 10.1021/es2002106. View

2.
Gaspar F, Castorina R, Maddalena R, Nishioka M, McKone T, Bradman A . Phthalate exposure and risk assessment in California child care facilities. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(13):7593-601. DOI: 10.1021/es501189t. View

3.
Deng J, Guo J, Zhou X, Zhou P, Fu X, Zhang W . Hazardous substances in indoor dust emitted from waste TV recycling facility. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014; 21(12):7656-67. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-2662-9. View

4.
Raffy G, Mercier F, Blanchard O, Derbez M, Dassonville C, Bonvallot N . Semi-volatile organic compounds in the air and dust of 30 French schools: a pilot study. Indoor Air. 2016; 27(1):114-127. DOI: 10.1111/ina.12288. View

5.
Giovanoulis G, Bui T, Xu F, Papadopoulou E, Padilla-Sanchez J, Covaci A . Multi-pathway human exposure assessment of phthalate esters and DINCH. Environ Int. 2017; 112:115-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.12.016. View