» Articles » PMID: 31755624

A National Study of Artificial Urinary Sphincter and Male Sling Implantation After Radical Prostatectomy in England

Overview
Journal BJU Int
Specialty Urology
Date 2019 Nov 23
PMID 31755624
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To consider the provision of post-radical prostatectomy (RP) continence surgery in England.

Materials And Methods: Patients with an Office of Population Census and Surveys Classification of Interventions and Procedures, version 4 code for an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) or male sling between 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2018 were searched for within the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) dataset. Those without previous RP were excluded. Multivariable logistic regressions for repeat AUS and sling procedures were built in stata. Further descriptive analysis of provision of procedures was performed.

Results: A total of 1414 patients had received index AUS, 10.3% of whom had undergone prior radiotherapy; their median follow-up was 3.55 years. The sling cohort contained 816 patients; 6.7% of these had received prior radiotherapy and the median follow-up was 3.23 years. Whilst the number of AUS devices implanted had increased each year, male slings peaked in 2014/2015. AUS redo/removal was performed in 11.2% of patients. Patients in low-volume centres were more likely to require redo/removal (odds ratio [OR] 2.23 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-4.86; P = 0.045). A total of 12.0% patients with a sling progressed to AUS implantation and 1.3% had a second sling. Patients with previous radiotherapy were more likely to require a second operation (OR 2.03 95% CI 1.01-4.06; P = 0.046). Emergency re-admissions within 30 days of index operation were 3.9% and 3.6% fewer in high-volume centres, for AUS and slings respectively. The median time to initial continence surgery from RP was 2.8 years. Increased time from RP conferred no reduced risk of redo surgery for either procedure.

Conclusion: There is a volume effect for outcomes of AUS procedures, suggesting that they should only be performed in high-volume centres. Given the known impact of incontinence on quality of life, patients should be referred sooner for post-prostatectomy continence surgery.

Citing Articles

A new adjustable artificial urinary sphincter for male stress urinary incontinence (Victo): preliminary clinical results.

Ameli G, Husch T, Hubner W, Weibl P Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(8):1546-1554.

PMID: 39280656 PMC: 11399051. DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-779.


[Structural health care reality in the surgical treatment of male stress incontinence in Germany].

Menzel V, Bauer R, Grabbert M, Putz J, Eisenmenger N, Flegar L Urologie. 2024; 63(7):673-680.

PMID: 38811419 PMC: 11219372. DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02360-0.


Changes and debates in male stress urinary incontinence surgery practice patterns: a contemporary review.

Desai T, Rozanski A Transl Androl Urol. 2023; 12(5):918-925.

PMID: 37305630 PMC: 10251107. DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-646.


Insufficient utilization of care in male incontinence surgery: health care reality in Germany from 2006 to 2020 and a systematic review of the international literature.

Baunacke M, Abbate E, Eisenmenger N, Witzsch U, Borkowetz A, Huber J World J Urol. 2023; 41(7):1813-1819.

PMID: 37261500 PMC: 10233526. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04433-9.


Dual implantation of penile prosthesis and ATOMS system for post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence: a feasibility study.

Falcone M, Preto M, Ammirati E, Blecher G, Carone R, Gontero P Int J Impot Res. 2020; 33(6):577-582.

PMID: 32499613 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-0320-y.