» Articles » PMID: 31750412

Implementation Variation in Natural Experiments of State Health Policy Initiatives

Overview
Date 2019 Nov 22
PMID 31750412
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: An increasing number of federal initiatives allow states flexibility in selecting the strategies used to achieve initiative-specific goals. Variation in the foci and intensity of implementation may explain why federal policy initiatives succeed in some states and fail in others. The CMS State Innovation Models (SIM) initiative is a complex policy intervention implemented with substantial variation across states and may have variable impacts. This paper presents a method to characterize and account for that variation in states' implementation foci and intensity in natural policy experiments.

Study Design: A combination of quantitative and qualitative measures of SIM implementation was used to characterize the foci of payment and delivery system reforms across states.

Methods: A modified Delphi expert panel process was used to prioritize the features of SIM implementation that would differentiate grantee states with respect to improved health outcomes. Three researchers then reviewed summaries of published evaluations and reports to characterize and score states on each implementation feature. Expert panelists guided the researchers on developing the criteria and weights applied to the focus areas when calculating SIM implementation intensity scores for states.

Results: Over 3 years of an expert panel process, 4 dimensions of SIM implementation that would most affect health outcomes were prioritized: 1) extent and breadth of stakeholder engagement, (2) extent that SIM implementation was focused on improving behavioral health, (3) amount of SIM funding per capita, and (4) breadth and depth of value-based payment reforms. Scoring states based on the prioritized factors resulted in composite scores that differentiated states into 3 categories: high, moderate, and low implementation intensity.

Conclusions: We developed a stakeholder-driven method to measure and account for variation in implementation foci and intensity in a federal policy initiative that was implemented heterogeneously across grantee states. Our method for characterizing state implementation variation may be useful for natural policy experiments examining the variable impact of policy initiatives.

Citing Articles

Effect of State-Led Delivery System and Payment Reforms on Population-Level Detection and Management of Diabetes.

Rodriguez H, Fulton B, Phillips A, Rubio K Diabetes Care. 2022; 45(10):2255-2263.

PMID: 35972261 PMC: 9643138. DOI: 10.2337/dc21-2425.


Leveraging Implementation Science in the Public Health Response to COVID-19 : Child Food Insecurity and Federal Nutrition Assistance Programs.

Lane H, Turner L, Dunn C, Hager E, Fleischhacker S Public Health Rep. 2020; 135(6):728-736.

PMID: 33031712 PMC: 7649993. DOI: 10.1177/0033354920959285.


The Early Impact of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services State Innovation Models Initiative on 30-Day Hospital Readmissions Among Adults With Diabetes.

Rodriguez H, Fulton B, Phillips A Med Care. 2020; 58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1:S22-S30.

PMID: 32412950 PMC: 7324298. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001276.


The CMS State Innovation Models Initiative and Improved Health Information Technology and Care Management Capabilities of Physician Practices.

Kandel Z, Rittenhouse D, Bibi S, Fraze T, Shortell S, Rodriguez H Med Care Res Rev. 2020; 78(4):350-360.

PMID: 31967494 PMC: 7374051. DOI: 10.1177/1077558719901217.

References
1.
Kissam S, Beil H, Cousart C, Greenwald L, Lloyd J . States Encouraging Value-Based Payment: Lessons From CMS's State Innovation Models Initiative. Milbank Q. 2019; 97(2):506-542. PMC: 6554499. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12380. View

2.
Coxe K, Hamilton K, Harvey H, Xiang J, Ramirez M, Yang J . Consistency and Variation in School-Level Youth Sports Traumatic Brain Injury Policy Content. J Adolesc Health. 2017; 62(3):255-264. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.07.003. View

3.
Chapman S, Spetz J, Lin J, Chan K, Schmidt L . Capturing Heterogeneity in Medical Marijuana Policies: A Taxonomy of Regulatory Regimes Across the United States. Subst Use Misuse. 2016; 51(9):1174-84. PMC: 4979574. DOI: 10.3109/10826084.2016.1160932. View

4.
Nilsen P, Stahl C, Roback K, Cairney P . Never the twain shall meet?--a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:63. PMC: 3686664. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-63. View

5.
Hughes L, Peltz A, Conway P . State innovation model initiative: a state-led approach to accelerating health care system transformation. JAMA. 2015; 313(13):1317-8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.2017. View