» Articles » PMID: 31742421

Switching from Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to Tenofovir Alafenamide Significantly Worsens the Lipid Profile in a Real-World Setting

Overview
Date 2019 Nov 20
PMID 31742421
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) has increasingly been replaced by tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) because of reduced kidney and bone toxicity with TAF. This switch has, however, caused worsening of lipid concentrations in clinical trials, but data from any real-world setting are scarce. The objective of this study was to characterize the effect of TDF to TAF switch on plasma lipid concentrations in a real-world clinic population. This is a retrospective study comparing lipid concentrations and other laboratory parameters between the last visit on TDF and the first visit after at least a 2-month exposure to TAF. A total of 490 HIV-positive subjects were included in the study. The median (interquartile range) increase was 23.2 (0-38.7) mg/dL in total cholesterol ( < 0.001) and 15.5 (0-30.9) mg/dL in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol ( < 0.001). The ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased by 0.2 (-0.2 to 0.6),  < 0.001. The proportion of patients having optimal LDL cholesterol concentration by National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) decreased from 30.8% to 17.8% and proportion having dyslipidemia or severe dyslipidemia increased from 30.2% to 50.3% after the switch. Demographic characteristics, antiretroviral agents, or comedication did not affect the changes in lipid concentrations. Plasma creatinine decreased by 0.03 (-0.09 to 0.03) mg/dL ( < 0.001) and estimated glomerular filtration rate increased by 0.5 (-2.3 to 3.2) mL/min ( = 0.009). Switching from TDF to TAF caused a statistically significant worsening of the lipid profile that may have clinical relevance. The benefit of the lipid-lowering effect of TDF should be considered in selected patients with low risk for kidney and bone toxicity.

Citing Articles

Comparison of lipid profile alterations in chronic hepatitis b patients receiving tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Lin S, Huang W, Liao Z, Ma H, Wu W, Lin M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27369.

PMID: 39521860 PMC: 11550411. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78656-0.


Risk of dyslipidaemia in people living with HIV who are taking tenofovir alafenamide: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yoo J, Jung E, Kim S, Kim Y, Kim M J Int AIDS Soc. 2024; 27(9):e26358.

PMID: 39301685 PMC: 11413498. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.26358.


Effect of 2 Forms of Tenofovir on Duodenal Enterocytes-A Hypothesis for Different Effect of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Tenofovir Alafenamide on Body Weight and Plasma Lipids.

Kauppinen K, Aho I, Sjoblom N, Tynninen O, Suomalainen A, Schwab U Clin Infect Dis. 2024; 80(2):381-388.

PMID: 39039812 PMC: 11848257. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae374.


Changes in Glomerular Filtration Rate After Switching From Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Preexposure Prophylaxis.

Rivera A, Pak K, Mefford M, Hechter R Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024; 11(2):ofad695.

PMID: 38352151 PMC: 10863550. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad695.


Tenofovir amibufenamide tenofovir alafenamide for treating chronic hepatitis B: A real-world study.

Peng W, Jiang C, Yang F, Zhou N, Chen K, Liu J World J Gastroenterol. 2023; 29(44):5907-5918.

PMID: 38111506 PMC: 10725562. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i44.5907.