» Articles » PMID: 31742215

Unplanned Operations and Adverse Events After Surgery for Diaphyseal Fracture of the Clavicle

Overview
Date 2019 Nov 20
PMID 31742215
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We used a database of patients treated at three hospitals to study the primary null hypothesis that there are no factors associated with unplanned reoperations or adverse events after surgical repair for diaphyseal clavicle fracture. Additionally we addressed the following secondary study questions: 1. What is the prevalence of unplanned reoperations or adverse events after surgical repair for diaphyseal clavicle fracture? 2. Is early implant loosening or breakage after surgical repair for diaphyseal clavicle fracture related to fixation type? 3. Is the type of fixation associated with the prevalence of brachial plexus palsy after surgical repair of a diaphyseal clavicle fracture?

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 249 adult patients who had surgery for a diaphyseal clavicle fracture to determine factors associated with unplanned reoperations or adverse events. Thirty-two patients (13%) had at least one unplanned reoperation or adverse event. Four of 249 patients (1.6%) developed early implant loosening or breakage. Patients that had local implant irritation, planned implant removal, or sensory symptoms thought to be due to nerve irritation were not included in the reported unplanned reoperations or adverse event rate.

Results: Only female sex was associated with unplanned reoperations or adverse events after surgery for diaphyseal clavicle fracture. No other patient, technical, or injury related factors tested in this study were associated with unplanned reoperations or adverse events.

Conclusion: Patients that have surgery for diaphyseal clavicle fracture have an approximately 13% risk of an unplanned second surgery or an adverse event. Women can be counseled that they are three times as likely as men to have an unplanned reoperations or adverse event.

Citing Articles

A real-world study on the influence of unplanned reoperations on hospitalized patients using the diagnosis-related group.

Fan R, Chen Q, Gao S, Wang L, Mao S, Yan Z Ann Med. 2025; 57(1):2473633.

PMID: 40038862 PMC: 11884101. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2473633.


Evaluating the Outcomes of Managing Displaced Clavicular Fractures by Using Precontoured Clavicular Plates.

M K, Paul S, Gupta R, Mittal A, Bishnoi S, Garg A Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e66095.

PMID: 39224714 PMC: 11368436. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66095.


Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures among Patients with Clavicular Fracture Admitted to the Orthopaedic Department of a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.

Nepal P, Karki N, Shrestha K, Karki U, Kc S, Shrestha S JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2023; 61(259):241-244.

PMID: 37203952 PMC: 10231528. DOI: 10.31729/jnma.8066.

References
1.
Wijdicks F, van der Meijden O, Millett P, Verleisdonk E, Houwert R . Systematic review of the complications of plate fixation of clavicle fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 132(5):617-25. PMC: 3332382. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-011-1456-5. View

2.
Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Johnston R, Belloti J, Faloppa F . Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (6):CD009363. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009363.pub2. View

3.
Ring D, Holovacs T . Brachial plexus palsy after intramedullary fixation of a clavicular fracture. A report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(8):1834-7. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02919. View

4.
Hosalkar H, Parikh G, Bittersohl B . Surgical fixation of displaced clavicle fracture in adolescents: a review of literature. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013; 5(3):e29. PMC: 3808804. DOI: 10.4081/or.2013.e29. View

5.
Ban I, Branner U, Holck K, Krasheninnikoff M, Troelsen A . Clavicle fractures may be conservatively treated with acceptable results - a systematic review. Dan Med J. 2012; 59(7):A4457. View