Methods of Cryoprotectant Preservation: Allogeneic Cellular Bone Grafts and Potential Effects
Overview
Biotechnology
General Medicine
Affiliations
Debridement of the bone surface during a surgical fusion procedure initiates an injury response promoting a healing cascade of molecular mediators released over time. Autologous grafts offer natural scaffolding to fill the bone void and to provide local bone cells. Commercial bone grafting products such as allografts, synthetic bone mineral products, etc., are used to supplement or to replace autologous grafts by supporting osteoinductivity, osteoconductivity, and osteogenesis at the surgical site. To assure osteogenic potential, preservation of allogeneic cells with cryoprotectants has been developed to allow for long-term storage and thus delivery of viable bone cells to the surgical site. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is an intracellular cryoprotectant commonly used because it provides good viability of the cells post-thaw. However, there is known cytotoxicity reported for DMSO when cells are stored above cryogenic temperatures. For most cellular bone graft products, the cryoprotectant is incorporated with the cells into the other mineralized bone and demineralized bone components. During thawing, the DMSO may not be sufficiently removed from allograft products compared to its use in a cell suspension where removal by washing and centrifugation is available. Therefore, both the allogeneic cell types in the bone grafting product and the local cell types at the bone grafting site could be affected as cytotoxicity varies by cell type and by DMSO content according to reported studies. Overcoming cytotoxicity may be an additional challenge in the formation of bone at a wound or surgical site. Other extracellular cryoprotectants have been explored as alternatives to DMSO which preserve without entering the cell membrane, thereby providing good cellular viability post-thaw and might abrogate the cytotoxicity concerns.
Repair mechanisms of bone system tissues based on comprehensive perspective of multi-omics.
Yu H, Yang S, Jiang T, Li T, Duan H, Li M Cell Biol Toxicol. 2025; 41(1):45.
PMID: 39966216 PMC: 11836151. DOI: 10.1007/s10565-025-09995-5.
Kronemberger G, Palhares T, Rossi A, Vercosa B, Sartoretto S, Resende R J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14(12).
PMID: 38132809 PMC: 10744288. DOI: 10.3390/jfb14120555.
Vascularized Bone Graft Reconstruction for Upper Extremity Defects: A Review.
Chappell A, Ramsey M, Dabestani P, Ko J Arch Plast Surg. 2023; 50(1):82-95.
PMID: 36755653 PMC: 9902088. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758639.
He Y, Li F, Jiang P, Cai F, Lin Q, Zhou M Bioact Mater. 2022; 21:223-238.
PMID: 36157244 PMC: 9465026. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.08.012.
Tally W, Temple H, Kenneth Burkus J J Spine Surg. 2021; 7(3):310-317.
PMID: 34734135 PMC: 8511570. DOI: 10.21037/jss-21-28.