» Articles » PMID: 31735998

Socioeconomic Status Differs Between Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Mastectomy and Breast Conservation, and Affects Patient-reported Preoperative Information

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Nov 19
PMID 31735998
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Breast cancer treatment is reported to be influenced by socioeconomic status (SES). Few reports, however, stem from national, equality-based health care systems. The aim of this study was to analyse associations between SES, rates of breast-conserving surgery (BCS), patient-reported preoperative information and perceived involvement in Sweden.

Methods: All women operated for primary breast cancer in Sweden in 2013 were included. Tumour and treatment data as well as socioeconomic data were retrieved from national registers. Postal questionnaires regarding preoperative information about breast-conserving options and perceived involvement in the decision-making process had previously been sent to all women receiving mastectomy.

Results: Of 7735 women, 4604 (59.5%) received BCS. In addition to regional differences, independent predictors of BCS were being in the middle or higher age groups, having small tumours without clinically involved nodes, being born in Europe outside Sweden, having a higher education than primary school and an intermediate or high income per household. Women with smaller, clinically node-negative tumours felt more often involved in the surgical decision and informed about breast-conserving options (both p < 0.001). In addition, women who perceived that BCS was discussed as an alternative to mastectomy were more often in a partnership (p < 0.001), not born in Sweden (p = 0.035) and had an employment (p = 0.031).

Conclusion: Socioeconomic factors are associated with surgical treatment even in a national health care system that is expected to offer all women the same standard of care. This should be taken into account and adapted to in preoperative counselling on surgical options in breast cancer.

Citing Articles

Increasing Rates but Persistent Variability of Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Real-Time Data from a Population-Based Study (2012-2022).

Heeling E, Kramer G, Volders J, van Bommel A, van der Ploeg I, Hoornweg M Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 32(3):1997-2006.

PMID: 39560828 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16496-y.


Factors Influencing Surgical Choices in Breast Cancer Treatment in India: A Comparative Study of Breast-Conserving Surgery vs Mastectomy.

Dubey S, Krishnanand K, Shukla Y, Sharma P, Tripathy S, Kushwah P Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e66825.

PMID: 39280530 PMC: 11393521. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.66825.


Receipt of mastectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy following breast conserving surgery (BCS) in New Zealand women with BCS-eligible breast cancer, 2010-2015: an observational study focusing on ethnic differences.

Bartholomew K, Ghafel M, Tin Tin S, Aye P, Elwood J, Hardie C BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):766.

PMID: 37592208 PMC: 10436661. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11248-9.


Medical and surgical postoperative complications after breast conservation versus mastectomy in older women with breast cancer: Swedish population-based register study of 34 139 women.

de Boniface J, Szulkin R, Johansson A Br J Surg. 2022; 110(3):344-352.

PMID: 36511352 PMC: 10364521. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac411.


Racial Disparities in Survival of Breast Cancer Patients After Surgery.

Wang S, Tang W, Wang S, Hong S, Liu J Front Public Health. 2022; 10:831906.

PMID: 35646795 PMC: 9136217. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.831906.


References
1.
Frisell A, Lagergren J, Halle M, de Boniface J . Influence of socioeconomic status on immediate breast reconstruction rate, patient information and involvement in surgical decision-making. BJS Open. 2020; 4(2):232-240. PMC: 7093785. DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50260. View

2.
Molenaar S, Oort F, Sprangers M, Rutgers E, Luiten E, Mulder J . Predictors of patients' choices for breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: a prospective study. Br J Cancer. 2004; 90(11):2123-30. PMC: 2409497. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601835. View

3.
de Boniface J, Frisell J, Andersson Y, Bergkvist L, Ahlgren J, Ryden L . Survival and axillary recurrence following sentinel node-positive breast cancer without completion axillary lymph node dissection: the randomized controlled SENOMAC trial. BMC Cancer. 2017; 17(1):379. PMC: 5446737. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3361-y. View

4.
Byers T, Wolf H, Bauer K, Bolick-Aldrich S, Chen V, Finch J . The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States : findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study. Cancer. 2008; 113(3):582-91. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23567. View

5.
Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese R, Deutsch M, Fisher E . Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(16):1233-41. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa022152. View