» Articles » PMID: 31735123

Inhibition Monitoring in Veterinary Molecular Testing

Overview
Date 2019 Nov 19
PMID 31735123
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many of the sample matrices typically used for veterinary molecular testing contain inhibitory factors that can potentially reduce analytic sensitivity or produce false-negative results by masking the signal produced by the nucleic acid target. Inclusion of internal controls in PCR-based assays is a valuable strategy not only for monitoring for PCR inhibitors, but also for monitoring nucleic acid extraction efficiency, and for identifying technology errors that may interfere with the ability of an assay to detect the intended target. The Laboratory Technology Committee of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians reviewed the different types of internal controls related to monitoring inhibition of PCR-based assays, and provides information here to encourage veterinary diagnostic laboratories to incorporate PCR internal control strategies as a routine quality management component of their molecular testing.

Citing Articles

Detection and quantification of DNA in water buffaloes () using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.

Fusco G, Cardillo L, Valvini O, Pucciarelli A, Picazio G, Cerrone A Vet Q. 2024; 44(1):1-8.

PMID: 39148364 PMC: 11328813. DOI: 10.1080/01652176.2024.2390944.


An Assessment of Diagnostic Assays and Sample Types in the Detection of an Attenuated Genotype 5 African Swine Fever Virus in European Pigs over a 3-Month Period.

Havas K, Gogin A, Basalaeva J, Sindryakova I, Kolbasova O, Titov I Pathogens. 2022; 11(4).

PMID: 35456079 PMC: 9027431. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11040404.


Infectious disease surveillance of apparently healthy horses at a multi-day show using a novel nanoscale real-time PCR panel.

Stout A, Hofmar-Glennon H, Andre N, Goodman L, Anderson R, Mitchell P J Vet Diagn Invest. 2020; 33(1):80-86.

PMID: 33179576 PMC: 7758683. DOI: 10.1177/1040638720972096.


Focus issue on best practices for development, validation, and use of PCR assays.

Toohey-Kurth K, Crossley B, Hietala S J Vet Diagn Invest. 2020; 32(6):757.

PMID: 33140707 PMC: 7649540. DOI: 10.1177/1040638720967122.


Best practices for performance of real-time PCR assays in veterinary diagnostic laboratories.

Toohey-Kurth K, Mulrooney D, Hinkley S, Killian M, Pedersen J, Bounpheng M J Vet Diagn Invest. 2020; 32(6):815-825.

PMID: 32996402 PMC: 7649542. DOI: 10.1177/1040638720962076.


References
1.
Burd E . Validation of laboratory-developed molecular assays for infectious diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010; 23(3):550-76. PMC: 2901657. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00074-09. View

2.
Chittick W, Stensland W, Prickett J, Strait E, Harmon K, Yoon K . Comparison of RNA extraction and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction methods for the detection of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in porcine oral fluid specimens. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2011; 23(2):248-53. DOI: 10.1177/104063871102300208. View

3.
Hietala S, Crossley B . Armored RNA as virus surrogate in a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay proficiency panel. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44(1):67-70. PMC: 1351936. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.44.1.67-70.2006. View

4.
Wilson I . Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997; 63(10):3741-51. PMC: 168683. DOI: 10.1128/aem.63.10.3741-3751.1997. View

5.
Miyachi H, MASUKAWA A, Ohshima T, Fusegawa H, Hirose T, Impraim C . Monitoring of inhibitors of enzymatic amplification in polymerase chain reaction and evaluation of efficacy of RNA extraction for the detection of hepatitis C virus using the internal control. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1998; 36(8):571-5. DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.1998.098. View