» Articles » PMID: 31731397

Technical Factors Affecting Ultrasound Breast Tumor Size As Correlated with Pathological Type

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Nov 17
PMID 31731397
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Accurate breast tumor sizing is very important in treatment planning; as a result, ultrasound (US) plays an important role in diagnosing breast masses, due to its non-magnified image and its availability. The continuous change in the disease pathogenesis of breast cancer and tremendous advances in US imaging technology require the continuous evaluation of this imaging modality. In this study, our aim was to determine the accuracy of US in measuring the size of breast mass, and if there is an influence of the different pathological types on this accuracy. This study contained 66 specimens of breast masses that underwent surgical excision and pathological examination of the resected masses; the mean difference between the size taken by US and the size taken by pathology was calculated to the patients as a whole and for each tumor type in this study. The result was that US underestimates the size of the tumor by 0.5 cm for all pathological types, and the US size is in agreement with the pathology size. US is an accurate method in measuring breast lesions with a degree of underestimation that may be related to many factors such as the tumor type, size, and margins. Complementary MRI is recommended in case of ILC and architectural distortion.

Citing Articles

Comparative Analysis of Automated and Handheld Breast Ultrasound Findings for Small (≤1 cm) Breast Cancers Based on BI-RADS Category.

Mun H, Ko E, Han B, Ko E, Choi J, Kim H Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39857096 PMC: 11763899. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15020212.


Evaluation of the validity of mental foramen USG measurements by comparison with CBCT and determination of blood flow.

Artas A, Yalcin E Oral Radiol. 2023; 39(4):699-707.

PMID: 37210690 DOI: 10.1007/s11282-023-00687-6.


Ultrasonography-based diagnosis of hemorrhage syndrome in adipose tissues in the crest of the neck of heavy horse breeds.

Harada K, Akioka K, Izu I, Sasaki N J Vet Med Sci. 2023; 85(6):637-641.

PMID: 37183015 PMC: 10315550. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.23-0084.


Predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A nomogram combining clinical features and ultrasound semantics in patients with invasive breast cancer.

Wang K, Meng Y, Yu Y, Cai W, Wang X, Cao X Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1117538.

PMID: 37035201 PMC: 10075137. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1117538.

References
1.
Parham D, Coleman D, Kodikara S, Moss S, Ellis I, Al-Sam S . The NHS breast screening programme (pathology) EQA: experience in recent years relating to issues involved in individual performance appraisal. J Clin Pathol. 2006; 59(2):130-7. PMC: 1860311. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2004.025619. View

2.
Cortadellas T, Argacha P, Acosta J, Rabasa J, Peiro R, Gomez M . Estimation of tumor size in breast cancer comparing clinical examination, mammography, ultrasound and MRI-correlation with the pathological analysis of the surgical specimen. Gland Surg. 2017; 6(4):330-335. PMC: 5566672. DOI: 10.21037/gs.2017.03.09. View

3.
Fornage B, Toubas O, Morel M . Clinical, mammographic, and sonographic determination of preoperative breast cancer size. Cancer. 1987; 60(4):765-71. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870815)60:4<765::aid-cncr2820600410>3.0.co;2-5. View

4.
Bland J, Altman D . Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8(2):135-60. DOI: 10.1177/096228029900800204. View

5.
Bosch A, Kessels A, Beets G, Rupa J, Koster D, van Engelshoven J . Preoperative estimation of the pathological breast tumour size by physical examination, mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study on 105 invasive tumours. Eur J Radiol. 2003; 48(3):285-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(03)00081-0. View