Maize Transposable Elements Contribute to Long Non-coding RNAs That Are Regulatory Hubs for Abiotic Stress Response
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Several studies have mined short-read RNA sequencing datasets to identify long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and others have focused on the function of individual lncRNAs in abiotic stress response. However, our understanding of the complement, function and origin of lncRNAs - and especially transposon derived lncRNAs (TE-lncRNAs) - in response to abiotic stress is still in its infancy.
Results: We utilized a dataset of 127 RNA sequencing samples that included total RNA datasets and PacBio fl-cDNA data to discover lncRNAs in maize. Overall, we identified 23,309 candidate lncRNAs from polyA+ and total RNA samples, with a strong discovery bias within total RNA. The majority (65%) of the 23,309 lncRNAs had sequence similarity to transposable elements (TEs). Most had similarity to long-terminal-repeat retrotransposons from the Copia and Gypsy superfamilies, reflecting a high proportion of these elements in the genome. However, DNA transposons were enriched for lncRNAs relative to their genomic representation by ~ 2-fold. By assessing the fraction of lncRNAs that respond to abiotic stresses like heat, cold, salt and drought, we identified 1077 differentially expressed lncRNA transcripts, including 509 TE-lncRNAs. In general, the expression of these lncRNAs was significantly correlated with their nearest gene. By inferring co-expression networks across our large dataset, we found that 39 lncRNAs are as major hubs in co-expression networks that respond to abiotic stress, and 18 appear to be derived from TEs.
Conclusions: Our results show that lncRNAs are enriched in total RNA samples, that most (65%) are derived from TEs, that at least 1077 are differentially expressed during abiotic stress, and that 39 are hubs in co-expression networks, including a small number that are evolutionary conserved. These results suggest that lncRNAs, including TE-lncRNAs, may play key regulatory roles in moderating abiotic responses.
Jiang B, Li Y, Shi J, Chalasa D, Zhang L, Wu S Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).
PMID: 40004124 PMC: 11854956. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041660.
Nikhil S, Mohideen H, Natesan Sella R J Mol Evol. 2024; 92(6):720-743.
PMID: 39261311 DOI: 10.1007/s00239-024-10198-5.
Tian X, Chen Z, Nie S, Shi T, Yan X, Bao Y Hortic Res. 2024; 11(4):uhae041.
PMID: 38638682 PMC: 11024640. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae041.
Qian J, Ibrahim H, Erz M, Kummel F, Panstruga R, Kusch S Mob DNA. 2023; 14(1):17.
PMID: 37964319 PMC: 10648671. DOI: 10.1186/s13100-023-00305-6.
Small RNAs: Promising Molecules to Tackle Climate Change Impacts in Coffee Production.
de Oliveira K, de Oliveira R, Chalfun-Junior A Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(20).
PMID: 37895993 PMC: 10610182. DOI: 10.3390/plants12203531.