» Articles » PMID: 31715647

Efficacy and Harms of Orally, Intramuscularly or Intravenously Administered Glucocorticoids for Sciatica: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Eur J Pain
Publisher Wiley
Date 2019 Nov 13
PMID 31715647
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sciatica can be a debilitating condition and there is limited guidance on the use of glucocorticoids administered via the oral, intramuscular or intravenous route for this condition. These represent viable treatment options in the primary care setting.

Objective: To evaluate the evidence on efficacy and harms of oral, IM and IV glucocorticoid administration for sciatica.

Databases And Data Treatment: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO (inception to October 2018) were searched for randomised placebo-controlled trials evaluating oral, IV or IM glucocorticoid administration for sciatica. Two authors extracted outcomes data. Continuous pain and disability outcomes were converted to a 0 (no pain/disability) to 100 (worst pain/disability) scale. Data were pooled using a random effects model. Overall quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Primary outcomes were leg pain and disability. Primary follow-up period was the immediate-term (<2 weeks from administration). We also considered adverse events.

Results: Nine trials were eligible. One study [n = 27] provided low quality evidence of a small reduction in disability with early administration of oral prednisone (within 1 week); MD -13.4 [-23.3, -3.5] but not for pain MD -2.5 [-16.9, 11.9]. There was low quality evidence from one study [n = 78] of moderate reduction in disability and small reduction in pain with early (within 72 hr of symptom onset) single intramuscular administration of methylprednisolone acetate; MD -24.5 [-38.8, -10.2] and -14.0 [-27.4, -0.6], respectively. There were no immediate-term benefits with IV administration.

Conclusion: The effects of glucocorticoids on immediate-term leg pain or disability are uncertain. Future large high quality trials are needed to resolve this uncertainty.

Citing Articles

Systemic corticosteroids for radicular and non-radicular low back pain.

Chou R, Pinto R, Fu R, Lowe R, Henschke N, McAuley J Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 10:CD012450.

PMID: 36269125 PMC: 9585990. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012450.pub2.


A mixed-methods systematic review of post-viral fatigue interventions: Are there lessons for long Covid?.

Fowler-Davis S, Platts K, Thelwell M, Woodward A, Harrop D PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0259533.

PMID: 34752489 PMC: 8577752. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259533.


Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for the treatment of back pain and osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ferreira G, McLachlan A, Lin C, Zadro J, Abdel-Shaheed C, OKeeffe M BMJ. 2021; 372:m4825.

PMID: 33472813 PMC: 8489297. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m4825.


OASIS-a randomised, placebo-controlled trial of oral glucocorticoids for leg pain in patients with acute sciatica: trial protocol.

Liu C, Abdel Shaheed C, McLachlan A, Latimer J, Li Q, Buchbinder R BMJ Open. 2020; 10(6):e040559.

PMID: 32580990 PMC: 7312281. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040559.