Toxicities Associated with Chemotherapy Regimens Containing a Fluoropyrimidine: A Real-life Evaluation in France
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Aims: Despite fluoropyrimidines (FPs) constituting the main component of the chemotherapy combination protocols in 50% of chemotherapies for solid tumour treatments, incidence data for FP-related toxicity are poorly documented in real life. This study evaluated the number of patients receiving FP-based chemotherapies in France, along with the true incidence of FP-related serious adverse effects (SAEs) before the recent mandatory dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)-screening was introduced by French health authorities, DPD being the rate-limiting enzyme of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) catabolism.
Methods: Exhaustive data on the number of patients treated with FP-based chemotherapy in 2013-2014 were collected in the Centre-Val de Loire region of France. True incidence of SAEs was extracted from a cohort of 513 patients with incident solid tumours receiving first-line FP-based chemotherapy.
Results: After extrapolation at national level, we estimated that 76,200 patients are currently treated annually with 5FU (53,100 patients, 62% digestive system-related versus 26% breast cancers versus 12% head and neck cancers) or capecitabine (23,100 patients, 45% digestive system-related versus 37% breast cancers versus 18% non-documented). Earlier (in the first two cycles) the SAE incidence rate was 19.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 16-23%) including one toxic death (0.2%, 95%CI 0-1%). SAE incidence rate was 32.2% (95%CI 28-36%) over the first 6 months of treatment. Incidence of death, life-threatening prognosis or incapacity/disability was 1.4% (95%CI 0.4-2.4%) and 1.6% (95%CI 0.5-2.6%) during first two cycles and first 6 months, respectively.
Conclusion: These data highlight the significant public health issue related to FP toxicity, with around 1200 patients developing FP-related life-threatening prognosis or incapacity/disability annually in France, including 150 toxic deaths. It is hoped that DPD-deficiency screening will reduce such iatrogenic events and eradicate toxic deaths.
Garcia J, Beers A, Reid P, Miragliotta S, Ward S, Williams S Clin Drug Investig. 2025; 45(3):111-123.
PMID: 39985748 PMC: 11876218. DOI: 10.1007/s40261-025-01426-x.
Shamaei Zadeh A, Roberts D, Williams A, Pandey D, Villano J Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2025; 95(1):26.
PMID: 39825952 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-024-04740-x.
DAmato M, Iengo G, Massa N, Carlomagno C World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025; 17(1):96822.
PMID: 39817118 PMC: 11664602. DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i1.96822.
Perazzoli G, Luque C, Leon-Vaz A, Gomez-Villegas P, Rengel R, Molina-Marquez A Molecules. 2024; 29(21).
PMID: 39519644 PMC: 11547717. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29215003.
Le Teuff G, Cozic N, Boyer J, Boige V, Diasio R, Taieb J Br J Cancer. 2024; 130(5):808-818.
PMID: 38225422 PMC: 10912560. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02517-2.