» Articles » PMID: 31710632

How to Design a Dose-finding Study on Combined Agents: Choice of Design and Development of R Functions

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Nov 12
PMID 31710632
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In oncology, the aim of dose-finding phase I studies is to find the maximum tolerated dose for further studies. The use of combinations of two or more agents is increasing. Several dose-finding designs have been proposed for this situation. Numerous publications have however pointed out the complexity of evaluating therapies in combination due to difficulties in choosing between different designs for an actual trial, as well as complications related to their implementation and application in practice.

Methods: In this work, we propose R functions for Wang and Ivanova's approach. These functions compute the dose for the next patients enrolled and provide a simulation study in order to calibrate the design before it is applied and to assess the performance of the design in different scenarios of dose-toxicity relationships. This choice of the method was supported by a simulation study which the aim was to compare two designs in the context of an actual phase I trial: i) in 2005, Wang and Ivanova developed an empirical three-parameter model-based method in Bayesian inference, ii) in 2008, Yuan and Yin proposed a simple, adaptive two-dimensional dose-finding design. In particular, they converted the two-dimensional dose-finding trial to a series of one-dimensional dose-finding sub-trials by setting the dose of one drug at a fixed level. The performance assessment of Wang's design was then compared with those of designs presented in the paper by Hirakawa et al. (2015) in their simulation context.

Results And Conclusion: It is recommended to assess the performances of the designs in the context of the clinical trial before beginning the trial. The two-dimensional dose-finding design proposed by Wang and Ivanova is a comprehensive approach that yields good performances. The two R functions that we propose can facilitate the use of this design in practice.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of phase I clinical trial designs for combinational agents along with guidance based on simulation studies.

Wang S, Sayour E, Lee J J Appl Stat. 2023; 50(9):2055-2078.

PMID: 37378271 PMC: 10291942. DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2022.2105827.

References
1.
Yuan Y, Yin G . Sequential continual reassessment method for two-dimensional dose finding. Stat Med. 2008; 27(27):5664-78. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3372. View

2.
Iasonos A, Wilton A, Riedel E, Seshan V, Spriggs D . A comprehensive comparison of the continual reassessment method to the standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme in Phase I dose-finding studies. Clin Trials. 2008; 5(5):465-77. PMC: 2637378. DOI: 10.1177/1740774508096474. View

3.
Wages N, Conaway M, OQuigley J . Dose-finding design for multi-drug combinations. Clin Trials. 2011; 8(4):380-9. PMC: 3485079. DOI: 10.1177/1740774511408748. View

4.
Mandrekar S, Qin R, Sargent D . Model-based phase I designs incorporating toxicity and efficacy for single and dual agent drug combinations: methods and challenges. Stat Med. 2010; 29(10):1077-83. PMC: 2931331. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3706. View

5.
Ivanova A, Wang K . A non-parametric approach to the design and analysis of two-dimensional dose-finding trials. Stat Med. 2004; 23(12):1861-70. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1796. View