» Articles » PMID: 31709398

Associations Between Sex Composition of Older Siblings and Infant Mortality in India from 1992 to 2016

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Nov 12
PMID 31709398
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study examines associations between sex composition of older siblings and infant mortality by sex, to guide efforts to address excess female infant mortality in India.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of infant mortality in India using four waves of data from the nationally-representative National Family Health Survey, collected between 1992 and 2016 (unweighted N = 338,504 for children aged 1-5). We used sex-stratified multivariable logistic regression models to assess the associations between sex composition of older siblings and risk of infant mortality.

Findings: Male infants with two living older sisters and no living older brothers had lower odds of infant mortality relative to those with one living older brother (e.g., 2015-16 AOR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50-0.76); this effect was significant for boys across all waves of data but was not seen for girls in any wave. Exploratory models focused on third order births found that boys were less likely than girls to die in infancy if born subsequent to two older sisters (2015-16 AOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.74); analysis of crude prevalence data indicated that this converts into a 64% greater risk for infant mortality for girls relative to boys in this third-order group.

Interpretation: Higher birth order males with older sisters have greater protection against infant mortality, a finding that has persisted for over 25 years. To address ongoing gender inequities in infant survival in India, greater focus is needed to support higher birth order girls and social norm movements against son preference.

Citing Articles

Interpregnancy Interval and Child Health Outcomes in India: Evidence from Three Recent Rounds of National Family Health Survey.

Kannaujiya A, Kumar K, McDougal L, Upadhyay A, Raj A, James K Matern Child Health J. 2022; 27(1):126-141.

PMID: 36352288 PMC: 9867668. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-022-03559-3.


A scoping review of methods for assessment of sex differentials in early childhood mortality.

Costa J, Victora C BMC Pediatr. 2021; 21(1):55.

PMID: 33499809 PMC: 7836200. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-02503-8.


Acknowledging complexity in evaluation of gender equality interventions.

Kalpazidou Schmidt E, Ovseiko P EClinicalMedicine. 2020; 28:100623.

PMID: 33205033 PMC: 7649608. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100623.


Gender equality: Framing a special collection of evidence for all.

Darmstadt G EClinicalMedicine. 2020; 20:100307.

PMID: 32300751 PMC: 7152814. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100307.

References
1.
Karlsson O, Kim R, Joe W, Subramanian S . Socioeconomic and gender inequalities in neonatal, postneonatal and child mortality in India: a repeated cross-sectional study, 2005-2016. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019; 73(7):660-667. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2018-211569. View

2.
Scott K, George A, Ved R . Taking stock of 10 years of published research on the ASHA programme: examining India's national community health worker programme from a health systems perspective. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019; 17(1):29. PMC: 6434894. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0427-0. View

3.
. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017; 390(10100):1151-1210. PMC: 5605883. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9. View

4.
Jayachandran S, Kuziemko I . Why do mothers breastfeed girls less than boys? Evidence and implications for child health in India. Q J Econ. 2011; 126(3):1485-1538. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjr029. View

5.
Gupta G, Oomman N, Grown C, Conn K, Hawkes S, Shawar Y . Gender equality and gender norms: framing the opportunities for health. Lancet. 2019; 393(10190):2550-2562. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30651-8. View